This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
As a general notice, this Wikiproject has been started. SonicSynergy 22:34, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The United States Law section does not directly relate to treaties in the general sense. It should be moved to another page or given its own page. A reference to the new location can be left on this page. (Teryx 06:35, 1 September 2005 (UTC))
There is an awful lot of what looks to be 'original research' in here. Many statements seem to be unsubstiantated and overgeneralized. There also seems to be a lot of emphasis on the notion of what a treaty is regarded as since the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties went into effect in 1980. When I have a chance in the future, I will try to outline some of these issues and bring them up here before making changes to the article. However, due to other time commitments I have at the present time, it may be a while. ludahai 魯大海 (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
What are the similarities and differences between the parties to a treat and the signatories to the treaty?CountMacula (talk) 04:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of 'Historical cases where treaties were terminated and response'
The material in Historical cases where treaties were terminated and response is about topics of primarily religious nature and significance, not relevant for the discussion of international treaties, so I propose to delete this section. ZBukov (talk) 12:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Agreed. The "treaties" described in that section are not treaties in the sense used in most of the article; the parties were not "sovereign states [or] international organizations." Chuck (talk) 13:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)