I wrote it because it was requested at the Article request and you agreed that there should be a separate artice on this storm. Storm05 13:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I only agreed because, at the time, I thought more information would have been available for a fuller article. That doesn't seem to be the case. I'll go back and revote for all articles. Hurricanehink 16:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I replied to your revotes. Storm05 17:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Also you did not revote all the storms you only revoted only the Alantic Storms from 1958 to 1999 and ignored the votes from the pre 1950 Atlantic storms, WPAC, EPAC and S. Hemisphere storms. Storm05 17:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I replied to your revotes. I'll to the others later. Hurricanehink 17:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
I added damage totals Storm05 15:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Oh wow! I revoke my merge comment, and based on the damage this can stay. However, more is still needed. Hurricanehink 16:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
I disagree. That's not enough damage and the article isn't that great. At least 15 dead and/or $300 million in damage is the threshold in my book. There are a couple storm articles that fail to meet that criteria but, then again, it's just my opinion. -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 22:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
$294 million is close enough. The article isn't great, but there's always room for improvement. Hurricanehink 22:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm still quite uncomfortable with this one's existance. It's kind of like how I feel about the Cindy article. -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 23:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Damn, it's that bad? J/K, but the article does need a lot of work. However, I think it is notable enough. Hurricanehink 01:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
<--- unindented... I'd like to think my copyedit(s) of this article went quite a way to improving it. NSLE(T+C)(seen this?) at 01:08 UTC (2006-04-12)
Very true. It is much better than when first started, but I meant it needs more impact. Hurricanehink 01:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Once again, I'm most impressed with your work! As per our recent interaction, I did a copyedit (here's the diff). I have just a few suggestions/comments left for you, and then will obviously be happy to promote. :) Keilana|Parlez ici 23:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Your use of "decreased...increase...decreased" gets a bit repetitive in the first paragraph of MH.
In "such winds were not known", I'm not sure "known" is the best word choice (also goes for "the strongest winds known at the time". Maybe "observed"? Or is that inaccurate?
That's inaccurate, actually. The winds were observed, but the NHC didn't know about them at the time. The agency often gets wind reports after the fact, which can alter how strong they thought the storm was. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Did Debby hit Hispaniola as a tropical storm or as remnants?
What about that sentence ("After Debby dissipated, its remnants maintained strong winds, and a station in the Dominican Republic reported a gust of 62 mph (100 km/h) on September 11") was confusing? Just curious... ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
...I think I printed a different version, 'cause I never read that. What you wrote is lovely and quite clear!
I'm not concerned about more specificity with the woman in Martinique, so I'm going to promote. Thanks for making GAN reviewing pleasant and easy! Good luck at FAC! Keilana|Parlez ici 01:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)