Talk:Tropical Storm Peter (2003)
 | Tropical Storm Peter (2003) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment
[edit]Nice work.Thanks for solving importance.I'll leave at Start-class for now.HurricaneCraze32 aka Mitchazenia 21:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- What's needed for B? Hurricanehink (talk) 02:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I am passing the article through to GA. It looks to meet all the criteria. Eluchil404 12:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
[edit]As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm delisting the article I wrote, as I don't feel it is notable, nor that there was enough content to justify its existence. --Hurricanehink (talk) 00:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)