Jump to content

Talk:Trump derangement syndrome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ~2026-31031-01 in topic Why does this exist? V inconsistent

Why does this exist? V inconsistent

[edit]

You can see in early edits and notes dating back to 2018 there are real attempts to make this article exist, even with little evidence other than as a twist on Bush Derangement Syndrome (which itself was not a widely used term and even then only as a one-liner to denigrate criticism.) So, why does this article exist when 'Bush derangement syndrome' doesn't? Petition to schedule for deletion or, at least, to fold Bush deranged syndrome and Obama Derangement syndrome into one article that better describes the phenomenon of this particular one-liner. Otherwise, it seems awfully political in existence, no? ~2026-17992-27 (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This article exists because of the huge amount of TDS out in the wild, uncontained. BDS doesn't exist because it is so rare it is considered under control and harmless. - Walter Who mentioned Pearl Harbour? Ego 19:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's an invented, fake syndrome Narcissistic Trump supporters use to talk down people with dissenting opinions. Its pretty simple; Narcissistic Trump supporters think Trump is "right" and disagreeing with Trump by extension is disagreeing with them i.e saying "they are wrong". Narcissists hate being told they're wrong, especially with clear evidence, and will do things like gas lighting and insisting its the world around them that's actually wrong when confronted. You are deranged yourself, you see a "huge amount of TDS out in the wild" and rather than seeing a growing dislike for Trump, you lose sight of the reality in front of you and double down on this make-believe syndrome. ~2026-27433-24 (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Agree with the initial comment, generally. This article is becoming a masked yahoo comment section but it's somehow legitimized because it has a link to an opinion columnist's article at the end of it. You can almost tell edit by edit, which side people are coming from...which to me makes it somewhat useless.
Delete it and have our grandchildren write it when it can be written by objective minds. ~2026-29341-73 (talk) 04:33, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Could we add to the article which psychologists specialize in this condition? Franco — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-31031-01 (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 April 2026

[edit]

There is no evidence to show that the term TDS is pejorative or derogatory. There is more evidence that leans towards TDS being fact. Please link to source or remove the term. Darrell Shelley (talk) 21:57, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Day Creature (talk) 00:29, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Trump Devotion Syndrome

[edit]

https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/the-dangers-of-trump-devotion-syndrome/

A section on Trump Devotion Syndrome should be incorporated into this article. ~2026-26992-67 (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Internal fights among the market-fundie people-who-define-failure-to-agree-with-themselves-as-an-illness? I think we should wait until there are secondary sources for this. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:39, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply