This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 00:39, July 26, 2015 (JST, Heisei 27) (Refresh)
SA 13 Bro (talk) 06:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Hello!!! Tsunesaburō Makiguchi birthday was on 23 July 1871, NOT 6 June, and also Nichiren birthday was on 16 February 1222, NOT 6 April!!! Don't know what the fucking hell that you all doing like!...SA 13 Bro (talk) 06:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
First of all I‘d like to remind you that swearing does not really help matters. I do acknowledge the fact that there is much confusion on dates like this one, but simply replacing one with the other does indicate that you do not seem to have much of a clue yourself either. In literature different dates are used pending on which calendar system the information is based on i.e Lunar calendar or Gregorian calendar. --Catflap08 (talk) 07:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Excuse me! Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to remind you all that; Tsunesaburō Makiguchi real birthday was on 23 July 1871, NOT 6 June, and also Nichiren real birthday was on 16 February 1222, NOT 6 April! So we hope that everybody NOT to citation the fake of dates, otherwise, you will get error confusion! Thank you and have a nice day...
Excuse me unknown person, please look up existing guidelines and look up mentioned sources on the issue thereby clarifying within in the article why different dates may be cited.--Catflap08 (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
@Catflap08: My your own business just keep quiet! You'll find out some clue in the future...
Your behaviour is still sub-standard. --Catflap08 (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)