Talk:Type 38 rifle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

1[edit]

Why no mention of the awkward 90 degree turn to cycle the bolt? 205.174.22.21 04:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

"indigenously"?[edit]

-TarenCapel 14:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

plagiarized[edit]

from http://www.nazarian.no/wep.asp?id=427&group_id=3&country_id=104&lang=0

Fair use rationale for Image:Type 38 Rifle.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Type 38 Rifle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Merge request[edit]

I feel a merge would be appropriate and that Type 38 carbine, that is a particular type of rifle, be merged here.

I agree, no need for an article for every sub-variant.--Sus scrofa (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I too agree, no need for new article. Should I do this (page creator) or is someone else meant to take care of this?-- Tano.Ca.garcia.s (talk) 17:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Anyone can do it as long as there is a consensus (which I guess there is since no one has objected).--Sus scrofa (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
I have been working insane hours so if you would like to complete a merge to here I am for it. Otr500 (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)