From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Udaipur, Rajasthan)
Jump to: navigation, search

Comment by SJ[edit]

The Demographics section needs to be cleaned up,the population information is presented twice and the bar-graph visualization is unnecessary if included in numerical form at the chart on the right. Population text needs the citation to explain the realignment of the city boundaries. (I lack the wiki formatting skills to do this at this time)

Comment by Dwaipayanc[edit]

It seems the Devanagari word for udaipur seems to appear differently in windows and linux-based systems. I was using firefox in both cases. On linux the 'u' in 'pur ' was shifted to 'r' making it 'udaiparu'. So I corrected that. Now it appears on windows, that spelling was correct. Any ideas why this is inconsistent?

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)



History edit[edit]

Udaipur was established by Maharan Udai Singh II —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indicom217 (talkcontribs) 15:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Reference:link removed narayan seva sansthan[edit]

Narayan Seva Sanasthan has got nothing to do with Udaipur's history or any information about udaipur.It is some kind of NGO —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indicom217 (talkcontribs) 15:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

External links[edit]

Please don't spam the page by putting unnecessary external links. ~Indicom217

File:Lake Palace, Udaipur.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]


An image used in this article, File:Lake Palace, Udaipur.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikiproject Udaipur- support needed[edit]

Hi Udaipur lovers, Thanks for your efforts for improving the Udaipur article. Taking it one step further, we have initiated a dedicated wikipedia project for this beautiful city of lakes. To get started with this, we need your support in terms of apporval for this project. We are required to provide approval/support in an ongoing discussion at the below link: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Requesting_dedicated_project_for_Udaipur_.28WikiProject_Udaipur.29

Proposed merge with History of Udaipur[edit]

The content on History of Udaipur has been copied and pasted from this article. Rollingcontributor (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Removed the section and the tags. Added the link to the spun off page in 'See Also' section. --Adroit09 (talk) 07:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Issues with the article[edit]

I apologise for the delay but here is an overview of all the major drawbacks of this article which need to be fixed before it can be nominated for GA:

  • The lead is in a pretty bad shape first of all. The lead should summarise all the major topics of the article. Take cues from Kerala and New York City.
  • For a city this significant historically, the History section is way too short. A lot can be (should be) added before it can satisfy the GA criteria. Mumbai and Kerala's History sections could be used as a guide perhaps.
  • Geography section appears to be a bit disorganised; a couple of images can be dropped and the use of bullets can be reduced.
  • Demographics and Government can be expanded, especially the latter is too short.
  • Tourism: the entire section is essentially a list and should rather be in prose form. Kerala can be looked up for that again.
  • Places nearby: I fail to see as to why there is a need for this section at all. It can easily be removed.
  • The lists from Education should be turned into prose, and Media needs to be expanded a bit.
  • This is perhaps the most significant issue in this article: the prose. The article is not neutral in a lot of places. There are far too many grammatical errors in the prose as well. A major overhaul would be required to fix this issue; perhaps WP:GOCE could help.
  • References are a mess; a lot of bare links, dead links and improperly formatted refs. Most of the references need to fixed.
  • The last thing is that a lot of prose in the article lacks citation; and it will take a considerable amount of time before all of the uncited facts can be referenced.

I hope that this gives a good enough idea as to why this is far from the GA status. Ping me whenever you need clarification or help with something. Regards, Yash! 16:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Yash! for providing such detailed feedback. We have already started working on your suggestions, and will surely be in touch in case we need any further assistance with this. Thanks again. Vishal0soni (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Page views[edit]

Vishal0soni (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2017 (UTC)