Talk:Unbreakable (Backstreet Boys album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Unbreakable (Backstreet Boys album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename it Motivation[edit]

I think it's best if we rename the article motivation.

Please sign your comments with 4 tildes. Why should this article be renamed? — *H ¡ρρ¡ ¡ρρ¡ 10:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should remain the same way until more info on the album are announced. So far, the title is not definate. 24.9.123.130 01:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Zinnia[reply]

Why is this article renamed "Unbreakable"? Artists are not reliable sources, you know. — *H ¡ρρ¡ ¡ρρ¡ 14:23, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

God dam[edit]

stop with the freakin citations. that stuff is mostly known already by anyone who reads bsb news. you can't freakin cite the things like when something leaked or whatever either. who cares. it's not like someone will be citing this in a college dissertation! seriously, check youtube if you dont believe songs are leaked and stuff like that. and i HAVE a copy of happily never after so it's not a lie. i got it from that radio site they were talking about. some radio guy's myspace had it.

go to the website jojoontheradio if you dont believe the line. and dont ask for confirmation on whether the song is pianoy or whatever because i HAVE the mp3 and it is... try doing a lil research of your own instead of asking for everything to be cited in every other sentence.

Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability - and take note of where it mentions that "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth" and "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material". --Kurt Shaped Box 22:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the page looks awful with so many citation requests. if someone doesn't come up with them, this page should be deleted or rewritten. i know a lot of people don't like wikipedia because of how often pages are riddled with distracting things like that. DGR 07:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is how Wikipedia works. In articles like this, people just grab every single bit of minute information they can find from all kinds of sources and put it in an article. No one knows what's true or not, and it's very likely that something could've been misinterpreted. I'm sure there is press coverage out there for their new album, so I think someone should read one or two of them, and write up a nice little paragraph or two and cite the source(s) you used. dearly 18:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia works when it provides information that is readable. If it is unverifiable, remove it, not tag it. Herunar (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

plagiarism[edit]

everything in the section under the link to the tmz clip is lifted directly from the official website site. not even a citation, brilliant. haven't figured out yet if they removed content to enter that, which is why i haven't fixed it myself.--75.180.47.74 08:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you read the charts?[edit]

I was checking to see if the BSB's album Unbreakable went platinum and under sales it says 610,00+1 ( the one is up and a little smaller, like a coefficient in math or something.) what does that mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.41.5.180 (talk) 02:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a numbered note, genius. Herunar (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Backstreetboysunbreakablecover.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Backstreetboysunbreakablecover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]