- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, all past Good Articles are being re-reviewed to ensure compliance with current good article criteria. I have determined that it doesn't meet criteria for the reasons outlined below.
- The main issues are of citations (2b) and (2c). There are many, many parts of the article that are unsourced, and many statements that seem to be original research or synthesis. There are numerous maintenance tags.
- Aside from that, there's some issues of comprehensiveness (or seemingly there are). There's lots of one or two-sentence 'paragraphs' which aren't actually paragraphs (by definition, a properly-constructed paragraph requires at least three sentences.) These either need to be a) removed, b) expanded, or c) merged to appropriate areas.
Considering the severity of the issues presented, I am boldly delisting the article. Remember it can be renominated at WP:GAN at any time if you feel it meets criteria, but the above issues should probably be fixed first. Direct any comments or question to my talk page (I don't watchlist these old reviews.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.