From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copied from Grant line[edit]

User Alaric 69 (talk · contribs) created a Grant line article recently. That article has now been WP:PRODded, so I've copied its contents here for possible use in this article:

When the Digital Equipment Corporation and its hardware designers conceived the UNIBUS, its capability to accept and interpret interruptions to the OS was highest on their list of things they wanted... so a four-level hardware interrupt scheme was born; the first in the minicomputer world.
To accomplish this, they created the UNIBUS, and its hardware-interrupt scheme. To do this, however, wasn't exactly simple in that day and age of simple (and expensive) logic chips. So they decided that any peripheral card (or set of cards) could assert an 'interrupt' on one of four levels on the system bus (UNIBUS or UNIversal system BUS)... and the software would sort it out. Remember, there wasn't any 'microcode' in those early days...
The bus lines delivering the interrupt signals had to get to the processor cards via the system bus; so what happened if you weren't using a bus slot? It happened often in those days, thanks to dedicated backplane slots.
Enter the Grant Card; it was simply a bit of Printed Circuit card that allowd an interrupt to cross an unoccupied bus slot.

Cheers, CWC(talk) 12:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

That's not too accurate a description, butthanks for saving it!
Atlant 12:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC) (Who was once, for about a decade, the engineer directly responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the Unibus specification.)

past tense[edit]

Is there a reason this article is in the past tense?

As far as I know, there are still plenty of unibus machines around, but even if there were no instances, the bus architecture still exists. Gah4 (talk) 06:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

The machines might be in museums (maybe some actually still in service too) but do not think any new models have been marketing in a decade or more. Are there sources for any recent products? So I think the past tense is deserved; this should be a mainly historical article, discussing the context of 1969 and how the Unibus innovated, its influence on subsequent technology, and how it contrasts with other options, etc. W Nowicki (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


The picture shows cards with 108 connectors visible (6 * 18), and I'm guessing another 108 on the back. Why is that? Is this three separate unibus connectors? I think it needs some explanation. Mnb20 (talk) 13:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)