Talk:Unicode subscripts and superscripts
When to use
I agree the second para needs a citation; I can't find one off hand. There are clearly pros and cons - interop is easier without markup, but the range of values is smaller. Will continue to look for some citations, maybe there was once some discussion in the WG, though I dont know these are public. Justinc (talk) 11:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know any current recommendations that make special exemptions for "²" and "³". That may be a leftover from the time when common fonts and computing platforms in English-speaking countries had trouble coping with characters outside the Latin 1 repertoire. But those days are mostly gone. So I replaced the paragraph with some quotations from Unicode in XML and other Markup Languages. Indefatigable (talk) 22:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- For anyone considering whether to use these or not: The Unicode Consortium and current HTML/CSS guidelines recommend using markup (such as <sup>) which will look more consistent. However if the reader copy/pastes text with markup they will often lose said markup when they paste the text. ―MJBurrage(T•C) 16:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Can somebody explain the addition of "Wikipedia:" to the page name?
This does not appear to have been done with other pages describing Unicode subsets.
- The move was mistaken, since the topic of which character encoding to use to represent superscripts and subscripts is not Wikipedia-specific, but rather a topic that is relevant to all of digital typography. Thus it is incorrect to say that it's not encyclopedic (which was the argument given for the move). It should be moved back. If one claims that "Unicode subscripts and superscripts" doesn't "count" as a worthy topic for an encyclopedia article, then you have to move half of Wikipedia out of the article namespace into the project namespace. It doesn't pan out upon analysis. — ¾-10 20:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Update: I asked at the help desk for someone to move it back, and it was restored. — ¾-10 17:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
"...your browser for instance produces 11⁄12..."
Not everyone reading this will be using a browser. Not everyone reading an encyclopedia expects to be addressed personally nor is it a very appropriate example. Very poor use of language here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
I am surprised that Google Chome on my tablet (Samsung Tab 2 - GT-N8000) is missing many of these chars, only showing 1-4 in both, while on my phone they are ok. I also tested in the app "Unicode Chars" with the same results. Maybe some fonts need to be installed, but it isnt obvious how to do that.
I dont see the same problem with Firefox on the tab, and no problems with Chrome on Ubuntu. Are there any other browsers with problems on some platforms? John Vandenberg (chat) 13:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)