Oppose: All of the aspects of the Aadhaar number has been adequately discussed in the article. A separate article will only serve to confuse the reader. The Aadhaar number, the controlling body UIDAI and the applications of the Aadhaar number, should all be kept on a single article. Rather, we should rename the article to Aadhaar, as UIDAI-related content is only a small part of the article.-Kenfyre (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed request. Number57 13:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
@Marlisco: I have removed the percentage column from the AADHAARs Issued (state-wise) table, again. We cannot use current data for the cards and census data from 2011 to calculate percentage. It does not account for migration and new births/deaths, thus results in numbers like 117.92% in Delhi. This misleading and is definitely WP:OR. -Kenfyre (talk) 04:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)