Talk:United States Senate election in Vermont, 2010
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This is a historical article, not a daily tally sheet.
If someone drops out or loses, do not erase them; rather, refer to them as having run and lost, dropped out, etc.
Actually all parties will be debating and 6 of the 8 are in the polling data(Rasmussen will glad give you a full report if asked), so there goes those idea. But for a second look, if we are to define Major party vs Minor, it would have to be based on historical relevance in that electoral area (thus the State of Vermont in this case). Therefore Independent would have to a major party (Senator Bernie Sanders), Progressive would have to a major Party (has broken 20% in Govenor's race 2 of the last 3 times, both times beating the Democratic candidate)although they do seem to have not fielded anyone here. But Jerzeykydd, you seem to like 5% margin, so let's use that as a measuring stick for major party status in Vermont in state elections for the last 3 cycles? Which as I look is almost broken by Liberty Union party twice both times for Secretary of State, is broken by the Libertarians for Auditor in 2008,and although not meeting the criteria, Cris Erickson herself has gotten over 2% each time she runs (on basically a one issue platform). So if we use this, you would have to move 4 of the 6 "minor" candidates upwards leaving 2 down there. Gloern (talk) 09:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on United States Senate election in Vermont, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101028234525/http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate to http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.