Talk:United States in World War I

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States / History / Military history (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

WikiProject Military history (Rated ?-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality assessment scale.

What's World War II doing in an article about World War I? Also, isn't a century 100 years?[edit]

The text presently reads, "Armor plate (and after 1918, airplanes) were exceptions that have caused unremitting controversy for a century." Excuse me, but we haven't gotten to 2018 yet, have we?

The text presently reads, "After World War II, the arsenals and Navy yards were much less important than giant civilian aircraft and electronic firms, which became the second half of the "military–industrial complex."" What on earth has this got to do with World War I?

I think both of these just plain need to come out, so I'm going to go ahead and do so.

By the way - what the heck happened to this talk page? Why would I believe that an article this extensive has had no discussion? Has somebody killed the entire talk page? Would not that be gross vandalism?

Poihths (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Much better presentation of economic and commercial issues needed[edit]

I believe that both this article and its companion article (United States in World War I, American entry into World War I) are seriously deficient in discussing economic and commercial interests and the role they played in how the United States got into this war. Analyzing this history as purely a matter of moral outrage and public feeling just plain leaves too much out. I'm no expert in this area, but those who are really should devote some work to this in order to present a full picture. Trade relationships with Britain and Germany were very real and very important. Those war loans were very real and involved very important sums of money, especially in a banking system that had very few safeguards and safety nets. How a possible future German Empire including Britain, France and Spain would have behaved economically and commercially would have had huge consequences for American interests. This whole aspect needs to be explained. Perhaps extant research in this area is inadequate, but it needs to be explored. Poihths (talk) 00:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States in World War I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)