This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I followed a link from Dmitry Sklyarov to this article to find more information. I discovered almost exactly the same content. this article is thus unnecessary as a redirect to Dmitry Sklyarov would give the same information. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
You're right about the duplication problem. The best solution I see is to move the case info from Dmitry Sklyarov to here. This is preferable because:
This article contains more detail
This article contains references
Most importantly, multiple parties are involved in this case, so it shouldn't be documented on the page of just one of those parties (e.g. why not just put all the info on the Adobe page?)
I'll put this on my todo list, but it's a list that moves slowly. Gronky (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
No problem with that. It's just duplication that is the problem. I does not matter which article is deleted. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 10:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The articles over the relevant parties should link here
I haven't checked if this is the case already, but the articles for each of the parties involved should all link to this article in some way.