This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Which parts do you have issue with? Jwoodger (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
I would not think this was a commercial if it included direct mention of who the competitors are, etc. Also, what OSS will offer the same things. But, I think an entry on a company cannot be labeled "commercial" automatically. Its Fuzzy. Besides, sometimes all one wants to know is what the company sells and a link to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JustAnotherJoe (talk • contribs) 19:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, but this has more of a feel of a commercial than other companies's entries flagged as advertisements.18.104.22.168 (talk) 10:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Untangle is capable of performing cryptographic attacks against users of secure services on its networks.
implies that software is able to mount an attack. In fact administrator of a client machine has to install additional root CA certificate in order for this to work. This is explained on the  under details. Vmpn (talk) 01:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 uses the marketing-friendly euphemism "man-in-the-middle style decryption" in place of the widely recognized man-in-the-middle attack. However, I grant that my original wording may have suggested a more directly cryptanalytic approach, so I will change the introductory paragraph accordingly. Feezo(send a signal | watch the sky) 10:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)