|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ureaplasma urealyticum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This is not a forum for general discussion about Ureaplasma urelyticum. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Ureaplasma urelyticum at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
If you are an editor who would like to help improve this article please enjoy this hearty welcome and expression of appreciation. Since it is a newly created article, it is possible to set some pretty high standards right from the start (we want to give the encyclopedia increased credibility and reliable). Please feel free to discuss this list article freely and with the goal of further improvement and expansion – your opinion matters! Best Regards,
- 17:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
This article doesn't make sense. Why does something that is "part of the normal genital flora of both men and women" need antibiotic treatment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand how does a person get an infection like this?
The figure of 70% incidence in the population is quite on the high end. The author should verify this or cite appropiate references.
I was told that this is a rare thing to catch.
you get it from having oral or vaginal sex like you get everything else accept it lives in the throat too so you get it from coughing and people can carry them around and give it from a hand shake cuz they live literally outside the box wash your hands and cover mouths people.
- Ureaplasma is an STD -- one of the most common. Safe sex with uninfected partners is your best bet. It does NOT live in your throat and you WON'T get it from people shaking your hands or coughing.Danierrr (talk) 03:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
The article has been updated with more reliable references from medical journals. A lot of that other information is outdated and just plain false.
- 21:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I tried to modify the article to more appropriately reflect the true conclusions of the citations. I agree with the user above that there is a lot of inferred causality from what has only been shown in studies to be association. Ahnika1 (talk) 00:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)