Talk:Van Williams

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:Greenhornet.jpg[edit]

The image File:Greenhornet.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Van as Green Hornet director[edit]

Quote from the article: "In 1993 Van Williams made a cameo in Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story as a director of The Green Hornet. It is unknown which director he was depicting." Can someone check the film? I am certain it was said that this was a test for Lee, or just maybe the pilot. The latter was "Programmed for Death," whose director was Larry Peerce. However, as the scene being shot bears no resemblance to any scene for that episode or anything else known to have been filmed for the show (including tests that recently surfaced on Youtube, some with different actors than those in the actual series), we can probably dispense with the implication that a specific real director was in anybody's mind here. Comments? --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date of passing[edit]

I find it amazing that in today's world that the EXACT date of someone's passing STILL can't be determined.

What is even more amazing is that even here in/at Wikipedia, there is no consensus.

The Death 'page' has one date and the Van Williams page has a different date.

Granted the dates are only a day apart --- Nov. 28 vs Nov. 29 --- but still I find it rather unusual. If there is current doubt about the EXACT date, why not use a "/" like "November 28/29, 2016" with a possible notation as to why an exact date has not yet been determined?

Just curious. 2600:8800:50B:6700:C23F:D5FF:FEC5:89B6 (talk) 02:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]