Please stop removing contents. T. Raj is also known as Karadi / King Kong amongst his fans and there's no need to remove it. Just like how Vijay is known as Illayathalapahty, Ajith known as Ultimate star or thala, Vadivelu known as Vagaipuyal, Vijayakaanth known as Captain, Simbhu (Karadi Kong's son) known as little superstar and most importantly Rajnikanth known as superstar. It's the norm in Tamil cinema. So stop removing stuff. Please learn to have some fun :-). Prove your points. If you cannot, then supressing, depressing and oppressing the view of a Tamilian. Thank you. Bhostjuck (talk) 15:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place to have fun ! pls have fun in Orkut, please stop this ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by R.srinivaas (talk • contribs) 07:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
R. Srinivaas is indulging in impersonation and false warnings. In this edit, he tried to impersonate PegasusBot, which is an inactive bot for the past 2 years. This allegation is strengthened by his actions of removing a SineBot generated auto signature of himself in order to hide his identity. He later inserted a 3RR notice on my talk page although I never violated 3RR, which is the essence of attempted false warning. All this put together clearly proves a case of not assuming good faith when directing a response. Nobody can get away with such henious actions because all actions are logged. He's lucky I'm keeping a cool head on this case of severe malpractice and not escalating the issue with any higher authority. Impersonation and acts of not assuming good faith will not take him far. They are not in accordance with Wikipedia's talk page policy. If anybody wishes to convey any message to me, please assume good faith and I will respond accordingly. Thank you. Bhostjuck (talk) 14:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Was there a point in that message?--Ssteiner209 (talk) 14:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah the entire article seems like a parody... Very unwiki-pedia like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
The entire article is indeed a parody, all the figures are wrong and the adjectives ooze sarcasm. It was a film that bombed in the box office with virtually no response. For all practical purposes, the entire article is satire directed against the protagonist and can be considered for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
The current version of the article is complete abusive and not following Wikipedia standards.
This stub needs to be neutralized — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ennvee.im (talk • contribs) 09:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)