|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Viet Cong article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.|
|This is not a forum for general discussion about Viet Cong. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Viet Cong at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.|
|Please be calm and civil when you make comments or when you present evidence, and avoid personal attacks. Please be patient as we work toward resolution of any issues in a peaceful, respectful manner.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Grammatical error in second paragraph: 'ferment' should be changed to 'foment'
Suggest changing first sentence of second paragraph from:
North Vietnam established the National Liberation Front in 1960 to ferment insurgency
North Vietnam established the National Liberation Front in 1960 to foment insurgency
Unless they were making alcohol.
Spelling Error in 2nd Paragraph
"Many of the Việt Cộng's core members were voluteer "regroupees""
Surely "volunteer"? The page is locked so I can't correct it.
Merge the pages but Change the title as well
Redrocker (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC) The pages should certainly be merged but the title should also be reviewed and changed. The term Viet-Cong was (and still is) a derogatory term applied by the South Vietnamese government, the US military and their propagandists to the NLF (and its military wing, the PLAF) and should not be uncritically adopted by any publication or forum claiming to be an encyclopaedia. The uncritical use of this term itself colours the perceptions of readers and implies acceptance of a highly subjective, politically partisan and historically arguable view of the Second Indo-China War. Uncritical use of the term 'Viet-Cong is the equivalent of replacing all references to the US military with the words 'Imperialist Yankee Invaders and Aggressors'.
- Keep, Viet Cong is vastly more used than the correct name National Liberation Front, per WP:COMMONNAME. For clarification see Wikipedia:Official_names. Also the use of Viet Cong in this or related articles has no pejorative or partisan intent or meaning. It is used due to its widespread popular usage by both South Vietnamese and American military personnel and civilians, AND common usage in standard histories of the Vietnam War. --Degen Earthfast (talk) 18:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Should not the article be called National Liberation Front instead of Viet Cong? Viet Cong is a name America imposed on these freedom fighters and is not their name. Viet Cong seems to be a jingoistic or racist name. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)