Talk:Vincent van Gogh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleVincent van Gogh is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 16, 2016.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
September 18, 2006Good article nomineeListed
March 31, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 28, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
July 1, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
August 1, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
May 11, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
September 15, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 31, 2020.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 17, 2005, December 23, 2006, December 23, 2007, December 23, 2008, December 23, 2009, December 23, 2010, December 23, 2012, December 23, 2013, December 23, 2015, March 30, 2017, December 23, 2017, July 29, 2020, and December 23, 2020.
Current status: Featured article


Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2023[edit]

Please modify this short description:

{{Short description|Dutch painter (1853–1890)}} 112.205.163.46 (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done small jars tc 11:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The surname isn't "Van Gogh"[edit]

At the top, it says "In this Dutch name, the surname is Van Gogh, not Gogh."
This is wrong. His surname is "van Gogh". Not "Van Gogh" 155.4.221.27 (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done small jars tc 10:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Menieres Disease[edit]

I have Ménière’s disease myself and I’ve been researching it a lot and have found several articles (some from the 90’s and early 00’s) discussing menieres as a diagnosis for Van Gogh. [1]https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-07-25-mn-1005-story.html 2603:8001:B101:9140:13F:AC16:926F:5AEA (talk) 20:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2023[edit]

{{subst:trim|1=



Why are there no sources for the introduction of this article?[edit]

There's a bit of information in the opening paragraphs of this article that, while persistent in the narrative of his life in pop culture, there is substantial, interdisplenary scholarship written that offers a more factual account of the events, rather than one sensationalized for dramatic narratives' sake.

Given the emotionally-charged nature of parts of van Gogh's biography in general, I think it would be worth adding citations for some of these details, so that the curious user can more easily access the sources of these details. Corvus.pica.pica (talk) 00:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Corvus.pica.pica: Please read MOS:CITELEAD. If you feel that some content absolutely needs to be sourced in the lede, you'd have to get consensus from other editors that are interested in the article. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:36, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We don't really need all that formality. If there's something in the lead that's likely to raise questions in the minds of some fraction of readers, there's no harm adding a cite there (and it's easy to do since, by definition, the cites must already exist lower down in the article). EEng 01:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Corvus.pica.pica That is a lot of descriptive wording to get your question across. Just what content exactly are you questioning? It would help this conversation stay on track, rather than veering off into a debate about whether leads should have citations or not. Please present what is so: "emotional-charged", "sensationalized" for "dramatic narratives' sake" here so we can better understand if it needs citing or not. Thanks. On a side note, most leads do not have citing because they are an "accessible overview" of the content found within the article; which is cited with sources. Maineartists (talk) 01:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]