Talk:VoIP vulnerabilities
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Issues with article
[edit]This article has multiple spelling and grammar issues and has issues with its tone. Capitalisation of acronyms is inconsistent. Parts such as "VoIP also allows the use of fraud and shady practices that most people are not aware of." are semantically unclear and are uncited.
There is generally a weak distinction between vulnerabilities and exploits.
"Secure SIP port" is not an exploit. Perhaps "Lack of enforced SIP security" (or something to that effect but more accurate) could be considered a vulnerability. "FreePBX has inbuilt firewall, you can use that to secure SIP port." is insufficient for an entire section on a "Secure SIP port" exploit, and does not adequately explain what the exploit is or how it affects VoIP. It also relies too much on the specific commercial example. Eddowii (talk) 11:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class Computer networking articles
- Low-importance Computer networking articles
- Start-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computer Security articles
- Start-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
- All Computer Security articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Telecommunications articles
- Low-importance Telecommunications articles