Talk:Walid bin Attash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2008[edit]

Any indication of his nationality? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 23:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wright lists him as a Yemeni (p. 310) Sherurcij (Because you can't fight terror by spreading fear) 00:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a courtesy to other to other contributors could we please discuss controversial edits on the talk page, not in the edit summaries?[edit]

Another contributor removed an image from this article with the edit summary:

rm - the prisoner in the image is not Walid bin 'Attash the subject of this BLP - no good reason given for the inclusion of this 'propaganda' image

I just responded to a similarly poorly explained excision here, where I wrote: "I request[ed] them to be more specific. Our article on propaganda further breaks down propaganda into types of propaganda. If the image was really being used as "propaganda" it should have been a trivial matter for them to identify what kind of propaganda it was."

I request responses at Talk:Ravil_Mingazov rather than here, to keep related responses together. Geo Swan (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

move[edit]

I suggest to move to Walid Bin Attash. I do not see any reason for the ' in his name. Any objections. IQinn (talk) 03:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Walid bin 'AttashWalid bin Attash—Per usual Arabic naming standards, the apostrophe isn't needed for the ayin letter.--John Cengiz talk 17:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support move as per nom. IQinn (talk) 05:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Waleed attash.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Waleed attash.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted COI template[edit]

The COI template was placed in June 2012 without any information on the editor who had an apparent conflict of interest. There was no discussion on this talk page either. I've removed the COI template. Mnnlaxer (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Walid bin Attash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]