This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
I've deleted the disambiguation hatnotes here, because this isn't a dab page; it serves better as a concept page, just as it is. I've also cancelled the redirect from the Wallah (disambiguation) page, and added the hatnote content there. I trust everyone is OK with that. Swanny18 (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
With three links, it doesn't really make much of a difference whether you have them in a dab page or in a hatnote. I would have probably left them in a hatnote, but the current situation is fine as well. Although with such small dab pages (only one entry other than the primary topic, the rest of the links being in the "see also" section) you might expect some editors to object. But I wouldn't. – Uanfala 19:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]