Jump to content

Talk:Walter Ohmsen/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: auntieruth (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I've made some copy edits. please confirm that what I've written is what you meant.
    Checked! Looks good MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Nice job on this. I've added a sentence to the lead to establish why this particular man was notable, not only for his decorations. In a couple other places, there was some verb and word choice issue, please check it. Otherwise, I'm ready to pass. auntieruth (talk) 18:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks good, Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]