Talk:Warner Bros. Animation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Please stop re-adding animated titles that Warner Bros. distributed. Warner Bros. Animation isn't involved in distribution; they're just a division of Warner Bros. —tregoweth (talk) 05:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. Just re-re-removed this same tired list. -FuriousFreddy (talk) 23:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Template Suggestion[edit]

Shouldn't we make a Template for this like others? You can view my page here to see what I mean. I asked because I don't know how to make a Template.--Mato Rei 03:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


What is the Dreamworks stuff doing in the infobox? – Ilse@ 13:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

No merger.[edit]

This article is not to be merged with Warner Bros. Cartoons, for reasons already explaine and discussed at that article. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 23:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

"Library" section.[edit]

Someone decided to drop a long and unreferenced "Library" section into the bottom of the article. If that person, or someone else, can reference and cite Warners' ownership of all of these assets, it can go back in. Otherwise, here it sits. Note that this is a cleaned up version I attempted to fix up, before I myself started questioning a few of the items on here.


Warner Bros. Animation also manages the animation holdings of Warner Bros. Entertainment. Aside from works produced by Warner Bros. Animation since 1980 and any animated films distributed by Warner Bros., the division also manages the rights to the following works:

Warner Home Video also has DVD rights to programs produced by Cartoon Network and Adult Swim, as well as the Peanuts TV specials and series.

Here's an updated version with more information:


Warner Bros. Animation also manages the vast animation holdings of Warner Bros. Entertainment, which include various aforementioned acquisitions.

Warner retains ownership of all the animated works they themselves produced and/or distributed, including:

In addition, Warner has also acquired several other animated works through various mergers and acquisitions

WB also has VHS/DVD rights to programs produced by Cartoon Network and Adult Swim.

WB also has DVD rights to The Charlie Brown and Snoopy Show, This is America, Charlie Brown, and the Peanuts TV specials.

Some of these programs can be seen on the Kids' WB website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Wait until it happens[edit]

Should films and TV shows that have simply been announced still be listed? These productions may never come off and if they do it could take a few years to make after that announcement. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 18:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

They probably shouldn't be listed until there's some evidence that they're actually going to be produced. Trivialist (talk) 20:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
There's also some house keeping on the current items. One thing is on the Wacky Races item. The only source listed on it is a toonzone thread. The only real evidence so far is a logo and an Upfront saying it's a reboot that is expected to air in 2016. Nothing has really mentioned if it's a ongoing series or a special/movie. Wacky Races would be "rebooted" in either. And also I checked the source and the one on the Jetsons article assumes it's 2016, although other wrestling news sites instead said 2017. And while there's no real source able information to it without a date from the studio, I'd say the pattern speculates more towards 2017. If you want to keep it because that's what the sourced article says I agree, but at the same time that source doesn't have any definitive information on a date. So maybe a TBA would be better. I also can't find the original post about the script from February/March 2015 but is second-hand referenced in this report from another wrestling site. Which someone can judge if found, since I can stand behind seeing said article making the current source incorrect that it was broken first on the Animation Guild page. [1]

I'll leave any actual editing to more experienced hands, as to whether they'd prefer to leave things as is until they are officially here with dates or not. (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Are the last few movie release dates real?[edit]

Are the release dates for the films after scoob real? Jstar367 (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Tom and Jerry: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory[edit]

Why does Tom and Jerry: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, which appears to be completely imaginary, keep getting added to the article? Trivialist (talk) 01:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Warner Bros. Animation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

  1. ^