Talk:Washington State Route 704

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States / Washington (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
WikiProject U.S. Roads (Rated C-class, High-importance)
U.S. Roads WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
This article has a map. If the map has an error, please work with the maps task force to correct it.
This article has been identified as having the following issues:
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
USRD KML no.svg
This article needs a KML file. Please work with the maps task force to create and add a file for this article.

Rarest Habitat in ... where?[edit]

From the first paragraph on page 2 of the Notice of Intent:

If you have a better source indicating that the USFWS really said "Washington" instead of "North America" -- meaning that the attorneys for the opposition groups misquoted them -- please post it. Travisl 15:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

If the US Fish and Wildlife Service actually called it the rarest habitat in North America, I would like to see a reference from them stating so, not from the Cross base coalition, which contradicts itself by stating both the rarest habitat in Washington on one site ( and the rarest habitat in North America on the other ( Since you are an attorney, you should know about backing up your facts correctly. Use the original reference from Fish and Wildlife and then I won't have a problem with whatever you put. Having me blocked to prevent me from accurately backing up a quote is paramount to censorship and you should be ashamed of such. PROVE YOUR QUOTES! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Luftmann (talkcontribs) 18:38, March 23, 2007 (UTC)
Citing a reference is "proving your quotes". It's not the best references out there, but I don't see you citing a reference for your wording. If you want to contradict a cited reference, you need to provide a reference of your own. -- NORTH talk 18:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC) also says North America: "The US Fish and Wildlife Service believes that the remaining South Puget Sound prairies may be possibly the rarest habitat in North America, home to at least 29 species of federal and/or state threatened, endangered, candidate and sensitive plant and animal species of concern, 18 of which are in the immediate vicinity of the proposed highway." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Northenglish (talkcontribs) 18:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
I was citing your reference from to change North America to Washington. Here is the reference as found on that site:
Since your organization contradicts itself, I suggest you place a footnote to the USFWS. That way, there will be no further dispute. (If you are having trouble finding it, it is the talking point down by the picture of Mt. Rainier). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luftmann (talkcontribs)
It doesn't necessarily contradict itself. It can easily be the rarest habitat in Washington, and the rarest habitat in North America. The line you keep changing is a direct quote from the letter of intent. I'll edit the text to make both references clear. -- NORTH talk 21:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Is there an online link to the EIS that was added. It would be great if we could reference it properly as we do the others. -- NORTH talk 23:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Done. Travisl 23:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I had just found it myself as well actually. -- NORTH talk 23:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The only letter in the fed/state agency EIS comments talking about the FWS quote comes from the EPA. Is there an original source attributing the habitat comment to the FWS or it is all second-hand sourced? There should be either a direct (v. indirect or third party) reference to FWS or the quote should be deleted or attributed solely as a claim made by the group opposing the highway or the EPA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Run26.2 (talkcontribs) 00:50, March 24, 2007 (UTC)

The article has already been edited to attribute it solely to the group. -- NORTH talk 01:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Spelling Question(s)[edit]

The wikipedia article on Cytisus scoparius lists Scotch Broom as a common name and this gloss is how I hear it. However as a child here I thought it was called Scotch Bloom because of it's spray of yellow flowers! K Krum (talk) 03:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Lawsuit status[edit]

I've not found that the lawsuit was dismissed or settled, but the link to the complaint is broken, and the annual report (.pdf) of the Tahoma Audubon Society mentions the successful protection of 800 acres achieve through a deal with the government. Google's failed me in finding out what happened. I suspect the case settled out of court, though. Can anyone verify? Travisl (talk) 17:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)