This article has been identified as having the following issues:
It is requested that a
photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
GA Review [ edit ]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 902/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: -- 17:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC) P C B
(see GA review here for criteria)
reasonably well written.
(prose): b (: MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists)
factually accurate and .
(references): b (citations to : reliable sources) c (: OR)
In ref 3, why is WSDOT abbreviated?
broad in its coverage.
(major aspects): b (focused): It follows the
neutral point of view policy
Fair representation without bias: It is
No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by
, where possible and appropriate.
(images are tagged and non-free images have : fair use rationales) b (appropriate use with : suitable captions)
I don't have any issues with this article, so I'll pass it. You might want to explain how exactly was the definition changed in 1991.