Talk:Watching the River Flow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleWatching the River Flow is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 3, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 12, 2012Good article nomineeListed
August 23, 2017Peer reviewReviewed
September 21, 2017Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Help would be appreciated[edit]

I gather that deleting the previous assessment generates a new one? Any help with the formatting of this article would be appreciated. Craig Walker (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Watching the River Flow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 16:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: I did one minor edit. Nice overall. Regards.--Kürbis () 11:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail:

Thanks for GA, Great Orange Pumpkin. Mick gold (talk) 17:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sheet music[edit]

Linking a sheet music source[1] is probably the better option. Otherwise, it may be considered WP:SYNTH to interpret it (X bars, etc.) —Ojorojo (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]