Talk:We're New Here/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria



  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Minor issues[edit]

  • No issues
  • No issues
  • No issues
  • No issues
  • No issues
Release and promotion
  • "The album was released by XL Recordings and Young Turks Records on February 21..." – Specify year
  • No issues
Track listing
  • "Sample credits" information needs references to validate information
  • No issues
  • No issues
  • Organize references by using {{reflist|2}}
  • Reference 3 – Link is not working
  • Reference 21 – NME needs to be wiki-linked
  • Reference 34 – Not sure if this source is reliable
External links
  • Not sure if first bullet point is needed
I fixed up most of the things you addressed, but have only a couple of questions. "Reference 34" cites the album's official website for information about its release formats, so for that it should be reliable. Also, according to WP:External links, the standard for linking is to list them with a bullet, so why shouldn't the first one be needed? Dan56 (talk) 21:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
I did not see the official website at the bottom of the page in Reference 34. When talking about the first bullet point, I was referring to making it more specific than "Official website". Instead, try "We're New Here official website". - Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
I renamed the link "Official album website". Dan56 (talk) 00:52, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article now. Congratulations and keep up the good work! - Rp0211 (talk2me) 03:15, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Overall review[edit]

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are only a few minor issues listed above that are keeping the article from reaching GA status. Once these issues have been fixed, I will feel confident to put this article in good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix the mistakes and/or debate the items you believe do not affect GA status.- Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC)