Talk:Web design

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2019[edit]

Prabhav99s (talk) 05:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[1]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 13:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)



I wanted to add to the external links section, but I read the advice in the wiki text.

I am leaving this here so someone can maybe utilize it. ––Handroid7 (talk) 03:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

What has been done[edit]

For this article, I had been putting up facts about web design that I had found. But, the main problem is that everything has been taken down. So, I am trying to figure out what is wrong with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredmaurer (talkcontribs) 16:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, your older edits were taken down for copyright violation (that is, copy and pasting from sources). Your latest edits have writing problems, for example: "Many guidelines help the people with the idea behind web design for a visual path to make them successful.", "When looking toward most websites, they have the traditional look." - I'm not even sure what information you're trying to convey there. - MrOllie (talk) 16:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2019[edit]

The article mentions "User Interface" design 6 times but makes no mention of the most important and most used visual chart "UX Honeycomb" when creating a user interface. UI/UX design is the base and fundamental aspect of web design. The UX honeycomb references the main 7 pillars of design. Is it useful? Is it useable? Is it desirable? Is it findable? Is it valuable? Is it accessible? Is it credible? It could be why "User Interface" wikipedia doesn't rate very far. Everyone else mentions the UX honeycomb. It's very important to design. Lehtianimation (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

It is a somewhat popular chart in some UX circles, but I'm not seeing that it's relevant enough to mention on this article and it's not really foundational. A brief summary of what user experience design is about should be enough. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2019[edit]

What I think is missing is the responsive design Abstract Web (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

According to a 2014 report from IBM, “for the first time, online traffic from mobile devices outpaced traditional PCs on Thanksgiving day”.[1]

 subtitle: evolution of web design
     - year and so on
Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. Moreover, there already is a short blurb about responsive design. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)