Talk:Wheelchairs for Kids
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Boozywand9 (talk) 04:58, 25 July 2015 (UTC) There is no way this article is promotional. I wrote it - Boozywand9. I am beginning to get frustrated with some of these criticisms of 'promotion' when all I have written about is about the fact of Wheelchairs for Kids. If this article is deleted I will disengage from Wikipedia because in order that I have a good understanding of Wikipedia I have read many pages on Wikipedia and the hypocrisy is rife in that celebrities and the wealthy and many individuals and organisations is in fact semi-promotional while other pages are information and public interest worthy. This page on Wheelchairs for Kids is concise, about the fact of what they do in the public interest and that they are a 100% charity and the reach that they have. If they are deleted that will be a deplorable outcome and disservice. Boozywand9
Is there something not cited? Is there something inaccurate? Is there something that is not of significance or not public interest? Boozywand9
Before anyone deletes this page they should have a good look at other Wikipedia pages, hundreds of them as I have.Boozywand9
Thank you. Boozywand9
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Boozywand9 (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC) This page is NOT promotional. This Wheelchairs for Kids not Kim Kardashian or some wealthy individual who'd otherwise get pages of non-public worthy material published as is the case on Wikipedia. The article is about Wheelchairs for Kids, public interest facts. It is cited. Wikepedia should have a record of Wheelchairs for Kids and even much more of their incredible work. I just do not get what is of concern about this article. If it is deleted I will disengage from Wikipedia, because you know in the end it is a public interest story that should be recorded and I think if it is deleted Wikipedia need to read its nearly 5 million pages and see the hypocrisy. Unbelievable. Boozywand9