This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This is a good article that well explains the concepts in the book, I don't see what further references are required? 220.127.116.11 (talk) 09:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
It seems to me that there's an unacceptable level of the author's viewpoint/opinion intruding on the explanations. Anyone who presents the RIAA/Kazaa fight as a victory for good Internet regulation, without noting the considerable amount of dissenting opinion, is not espousing an NPOV. ALloydFlanagan (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
There has been no action on the POV-check request since it was added almost three years ago now. I made a few changes to the article, added a second review and reworded the initial review to use different quotes with little or no editorial comment added. We need to remember that it is the article that should have a neutral POV and not the book that the article is reviewing. I've removed the POV-check template. Jeff Ogden (talk) 23:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
I am the co-author of this book. As it stands it seems relatively fair and I like the pictures. Jack may feel differently. If there are any questions post here and I can answer Superwuster (talk) 21:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Awesome, welcome to Wikipedia. groupuscule (talk) 22:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)