Talk:WikiLeaks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

i need yo talk[edit]

Bold text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:A00:60D0:C8D9:4177:25E1:1C75 (talk) 08:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WikiLeaks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on WikiLeaks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

upcoming leaks section?[edit]

It seems to me that this section needs a rewrite or maybe even deleted, as it seems to be rather outdated containing only annoucement from the 2009 to 2011.--Kmhkmh (talk) 15:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

no-outing editors policy and WikiLeaks[edit]

UGH. So would it violate the WP:HARRASS to say something? Horrified by the DNC Wikileaks and what it says about editing WP. Can I say that? If-so, I'll accept the ban. And I'm on the record here as being pro-no-outing with no exceptions.TeeVeeed (talk) 15:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm no expert on the harassment policy, but it might be ok to post non-specific info about it. Perhaps it's best to ask an admin about this. Pinging Bbb23, an admin, for help with this. -- Gestrid (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Say what? What has Wikileaks to do with editing WP? and what exactly is horrible now? And outing what or who?--Kmhkmh (talk) 18:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Well, just wondering if linking offsite to info. about editors...I think it is "outing", but if it is not explicitly connected to a real person/and editor, then it probably is OK, but if a Wikileak identified an editor by that editor's name, it would be outing-right?TeeVeeed (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Like this for instance, it exposes someone with intent to manipulate their article, but not an editor named exactly, so this would be OK-right? https://wikileaks.org/hackingteam/emails/emailid/21723 TeeVeeed (talk) 21:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I have no idea what's going on here, but if thinks there is an outing problem with an edit or multiple edits, they should contact the oversight team or an individual oversighter. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)