Talk:Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former featured articleWikipedia is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
March 9, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
April 4, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 9, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 4, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
August 1, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
September 15, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 25, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
May 17, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
August 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 15, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
September 6, 2008Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
July 21, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
July 26, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
November 7, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 25, 2014Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
September 5, 2014Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 15, 2005.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of February 7, 2007.
Current status: Former featured article

Daily page views for this article over the last 2.5 years

Detailed traffic statistics

Why not to link an only-text mode of visualization at the end of Wikipedia web pages?[edit]

Wikipedia Bias[edit]

Wikipedia is very biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theodore E (talkcontribs) 09:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

In what way? I would also be intrigued to find out how the 72,000 contributors from most countries in the world work in concert to maintain that bias. HiLo48 (talk) 09:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Notably, WP is biased in favor of WP. We should get a non-WP editor to write this article. Thanks ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2019[edit]

Wikipedia is not working please make it work please fix it now thank you 2601:240:E480:6F66:906D:6862:18A7:A29E (talk) 01:51, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Not done. Hey there, sorry but this is not the place for this; this talk page should only be used to talk about the page Wikipedia. If you have a specific question about something on Wikipedia, feel free to ask at the Teahouse; but please be more specific as to what exactly isn't working. We'd be happy to try to help you out with any problems you may have. Best, --SkyGazer 512 My talk page 01:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

o_0[edit]

Why is Wikipedia on Wikipedia? If you're on it you know what it is. ThePRoGaMErGD (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Hey ThePRoGaMErGD; it's true that most readers probably know the basics of what Wikipedia is, but this page has a lot more information than most readers would know; e.g. its history, cultural impact, etc. :-) Because of how much coverage Wikipedia has received in reliable sources, it easily meets the notability criteria for web content, and most of the time is treated like any other page. As stated in the header of this talk page, "The question of whether Wikipedia should have an article on itself has been raised many times before, and the answer is definitely yes." I hope this helps!--SkyGazer 512 My talk page 21:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Page views[edit]

Does anyone have any idea why this article has had a significant uptick in page views yesterday? Just curious. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 12:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)