Talk:William Forster (Australian politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Politics and Government (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
WikiProject Australia / History / Politics / Sydney (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon William Forster (Australian politician) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian history.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (marked as Mid-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to for other than editorial assistance.


I think that whoever initially wrote this was probably trying to write an article about William Forster (judge), in relation to the article about the Northern Territory Supreme Court (there was a link from there), but accidentally got the wrong William Forster. I think it is easy enough to confuse the two, and then also to confuse it again with the former governor general. All 3 are basically legal professions, and it is imaginable that someone could have done all 3 - been governor general, chief justice and state premier.

Anyway, what we have now is a situation where we now need to write all 4 biographies and then have a disambig page. I filled in this on here, and did the judge one, but this needs to be moved to William Forster (NSW premier), as well as having a disambiguation page. This guy was important though, and it is worthy to list him in the encyclopaedia.

Anyone willing to tidy this all up?

Or alternatively we could just delete this biography and move the judge one to here. 10:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

I've created the disambig page, but this article needs cleaning up from the dump of 1940s text, and the judge one needs wikifying. I don't intend to do those in the forseeable future. Particular things are to replace q.v. with wikilinks to the right people, and merge info from other sources. --Scott Davis Talk 11:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Why do I have to tidy it up? Can't someone else? I thought this was a group effort? :). Oh well did what I can with a few links thrown in. 13:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

It is a group effort. However my interests don't generally extend to either NT judges or NSW premiers. If you'd picked an SA premier, I'd probably be interested in helping. You are welcome to find someone else interested in helping these articles, or if you want, leave them and see when some other editor finds them in a cleanup project and helps out. In general, we have not simply copied text from PD sources until we have time to make them look like Wikipedia articles too. --Scott Davis Talk 14:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Well, I am not interested in either of these people either. I was just filling in links as best as I could. I was just trying to write a bit about the judge for the Peter Falconio trial, and it led to the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory which then led to a link to William Forster, which was the wrong one. I actually didn't really want to get too much in depth. So I will leave it at this, and let someone who actually cares about the topic clean it up. I am still not convinced that the article as it stands requires clean up though. I think it says all you need to know about him as it is. What else do you need to know? 14:20, 15 November 2005 (UTC)