Talk:Winkler County nurse whistleblower case

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Winkler County nurse whistleblower case/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 1ST7 (talk · contribs) 23:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

I'll review this nomination. Initial comments should be posted soon. --1ST7 (talk) 23:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Here's the review:

  1. Well-written
    • "Protection from prosecution was built into Texas whistleblower laws." Maybe "incorporated into" would be a better way to phrase it?
    • The lead says that the complaint was submitted in 2008, but the rest of the article says it was in 2009. As the latter seems to be correct, can you please make the lead consistent with the other text?
  • Good catch. Was definitely '09 because some of the alleged misconduct in the complaint occurred that year. Fixed. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 05:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
    • "The board noted that it received 6,849 complaints in 2010." Wikipedia:Words to watch discourages using the word "note" or any of its variants as a synonym for "said". Can you please reword?
  • Thanks for the reminder. I am bad about this one. I just went with "the board received" if that's okay. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 05:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
    • Please mention Mitchell and Galle's termination of employment before the aftermath section, if possible.
  • Done. Changed the title of the Arrests and criminal charges section, reworded some stuff and added a couple of sources to that section. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 05:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
  1. Verifiable with no original research:
  2. Broad in its coverage:
  3. Neutral:
  4. Stable:
  5. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

As a whole, this article looks close to ready for promotion to GA status. I will put it on hold for a week to give you time to address these issues. Thanks for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 03:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your prompt review. I believe I've addressed the above. Let me know if I can do anything else. Again, I appreciate your help. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 05:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome. The article looks good to go now, so I'm passing it. Congratulations, and thanks again for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 06:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)