This diff shows material that I have reverted as being unsourced. The material is interesting, of that I have no doubt, but it is unsourced. Accordingly I am bringing this to the talk page for interested parties to discuss and reach a conclusion. I am neutral about the material, which looks like grist to the mill, but I oppose the introduction of unsourced material. Thus I have reverted the re-addition on that important technicality.
Find sources and it should go in. WP:42 applies in all cases. FiddleFaddle 12:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)