This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of popular culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is part of WikiProject Gender Studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport, a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women's sport-related topics on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Why is there no definition of what a woman warrior is?
Is this page necessary? I ask because after reading the archived talk-pages, the greatest weakness of this article seems to be that there is no actual definition of what a "woman warrior" actually is. There is picture of Joan of Arc, but no text to explain why she should be considered one. Also, according to the introduction, this page is about The portrayal of women warriors in literature and popular culture. Why then is there a section on archaeology and historical examples? This doesn't address the huge lack of citations and OR that's on this page.
It seems to me that outside of having a page with the words "woman warrior" on it the information presented here can also be found on other Wiki pages, presented in a much cleaner context than what we have on this page. Beag maclir (talk) 19:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Moving Non-Literature and Pop Culture References Here
I'm not saying this article can't include this information, but as the introduction states this is about the portrayal of women warriors in literature and pop culture, not history. As a result please put back the information if the article is changed to reflect a wider range, if editors in the future feel it is necessary. Beag maclir (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
In the older literature, the term "warrioress", following the author/authoress pattern, was sometimes used when describing women warriors. In terms of the archaeological record, in 1997 the earliest known women warrior burial mounds were excavated in southern Russia. They were buried with their swords, daggers, arrowheads and saddles. David Anthony states, "About 20% of Scythian-Sarmatian 'warrior graves' on the lower Don and lower Volga contained females dressed for battle in the same manner as men, a phenomenon that probably inspired the Greek tales about the Amazons."
In 2004, the 2,000 year old remains of an Iranian female warrior were found in the northwestern Iranian city of Tabriz.
The daughter of a Duke, Princess Pingyang raised and commanded her own army in the revolt against the Sui Dynasty. Later, her father would become Emperor Gaozu. Artemisia I of Caria was a tyrant of Halicarnassus allied with Xerxes and commanded five ships of her own in the Battle of Salamis; though her actions in the battle are questioned by some historians, it is said that Xerxes commented after the battle, a Persian loss, that "my men have turned into women and my women into men" in compliment to Artemisia's performance. The Spartan princess Arachidamia is said to have fought Pyrrhus (of the phrase "pyrrhic victory") with a group of Spartan females under her command, and killed several soldiers before perishing, though little else is known about her. The British Queen, Boudicca, led a revolt against the Roman Empire in 60 AD but was decisively defeated at at the Battle of Watling Street .
Women leaders have not only played an important role in cultures where there is a direct analogy to the western concept of a "princess," but have also served their societies in indigenous tribal warfare and rebellion, as well. The Dahomey people, who live in western Africa also established an all female militia, who served as royal bodyguards to the king. With regard to Native American history, the majority of Native American tribes possessed respected and well established women leaders of their "militia". These female leaders determined the fate of prisoners of war among other tribal decisions. However, the Europeans and early American men refused to deal with Native American women on such matters and so their significance was not understood or appreciated until relatively recently.
In Vietnam the sisters Trung Trac and Trung Nhi led a rebel against the Han rule in 40 AD. According to folk tradition, they were joined by many woman warriors and succeeded in establishing a short live independence. Another woman warrior called Lady Trieu rose up against Eastern Wu oppression in North Vietnam. An early modern example is the Tay Son General Bui Thi Xuan who led an army in the age of gunpowder.
In South Asia and the Indian Subcontinent, the concept of a "woman warrior" exists both in mythology and in history, and there are records of women who have led armies into battle. Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi was one of the leading figures of the Indian Rebellion of 1857 and was described by the British as "remarkable for her beauty, cleverness and perseverance", and that she had been "the most dangerous of all the rebel leaders".Unniyarcca was a famed warrior princess who lived in south Indian state of Kerala during the 16th century. Kittur Chennamma, queen of the princely state of Kittur led a rebellion against the British decades before the 1857 uprising. 
^Social Text Collective (Auth.); McClintock A, Mufti A, & Shohat E (Eds.) (1997). Dangerous liaisons: Gender, nation, and postcolonial perspectives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-2649-6
^David, Saul (2003), The Indian Mutiny: 1857, Penguin, London p367
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. I would hold off renaming this article until its scope is hammered out. My understanding in the previous discussions is that this page is suppose to be about the stock character-type in general, a sort of WP:DABCONCEPT page about the topic. The page is already written in sort of a summary style, linking to the more detailed articles of List of women warriors in folklore, List of female action heroes, and List of female action heroes (when an article is written in a summary style, "information presented here already exists in other articles" is what it is suppose to do: summarize content from different articles into one page). If that is the case, per WP:CRITERIA a longer less-concise title would not be appropriate because there is no "woman warrior" articles that need to be disambiguated from (the scope that is in "literature and popular culture" is already stated in the lead section). Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment If the only thing this article is suppose to do is recap (I'm sorry, "summarize") what is presented elsewhere in better sourced articles, then so be it. I've noticed there are a lot of Wiki articles that get away from actually using any citations at all because they apparently link to other pages that, in theory, are cited; if that's the way editors here roll I certainly won't get in the way of WP:CRITERIA. I retract the suggestion of a name change. Best of luck. Beag maclir (talk) 18:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Support, per the current content. I was mildly surprised to see that this broad topic appears Wikipedia-notable. Not sure about the capitals A, P & C, shouldn't it all be lowercase? Give some thought to alternatives to the awkward "in literature and popular culture". Maybe Women warriors in literature and culture. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.