|WikiProject Business||(Rated Start-class, High-importance)|
|WikiProject Home Living||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
2007-04-13 Automated pywikipediabot message
|This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I removed the following sentence from the end of the Consequences section because it looked to me like vandalism:
- Urban term for working at home is Durick
I think "Durick" is a surname. What else it might be, I don't know. I've certainly never heard of working at home being called "Durick." It just doesn't ring true. If someone knows that this is legitimate, please restore the material, but include more information and, for goodness sake, a source! —CKA3KA (Skazka) (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
section = good schemes
- If it is good, then 'scheme' should not be at the end of the title.
The scheme itself
The article doesn't say a word on what the very deceit is. Is it low payment? Or not paying for the job at all? Making to sign a fraudulent contract? How does a conner actually 'extort' money as the preface mentions? I can't figure that. — Vano 08:54, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- The article mentions an "initial fee to join", but you're right, this should be more obvious. Skimming the sources, the other obvious con is to sell apparently cheap goods to the victim for resale, which turn out to be worthless or very hard to resell. I'll update the article. --McGeddon (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
concerning the word 'scheme'
At the top of the Wikipedia page of 'Work from Home Schemes', it says that, anyone typing in 'Work from Home' will be redirected here. Although this is largely true, I disagree. There are but a handful, if that, of legitimate 'Work from Home' opportunities and it is unfortunate that they would be lumped in with the schemes and scams. I'm suggesting a separate 'Work from Home' page within Wikipedia for the sake of the good that is there despite how little. I've just discovered this page today. I will gather my resources and create worthwhile content for this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamcnut (talk • contribs) 19:07, 4 June 2015
Changes I have Done
I've added a few following points to types of work and how people sell these course on making money online. Teaching people by giving them some info product on make money online. Coaching programs on make money online184.108.40.206 (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)James Smith