Talk:Xchanging

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

This is definitely biased in favor of the company. So far as I can tell the text was not stolen directly from the company's website. Sophy's Duckling 01:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that the XCHANGING main page has been locked due to [recent repetitive additions]. Why was this comment regarded as vandalism? How can a fact be vandalism? Are Wikipedia only interested in positive issues regarding a company? Why shouldn't negative comments about a company be allowed if they are true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.242.63 (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Removed. Uncle G (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.242.63 (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Say what? I had originally proposed to delete this page as uninformative advertising. These claims you are making need first to be referenced to reliable sources that other people can check out. Do that, and your case for including them will be much stronger. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 03:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • agreed...whoever keeps putting up this unsubstantiated claim needs to back it up with some facts rather than just writing an unreliable statement. Something like this could be considered slander against the person could it not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.83.99 (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • have has to delete the revision about Folkestone. it is made up again. this guy continues to do this, and we will continue to remove it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowing101 (talkcontribs) 15:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pending review lacks citations and links to claims; content is not verifable Rowing101 (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xchanging BM rgb.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Xchanging BM rgb.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xchanging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Xchanging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Xchanging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]