Talk:Xi baryon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Physics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Hadron overhaul[edit]

Please give input at Talk:Hadron#Hadron overhaul. Thanks. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 01:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Xi-0 Lifetime[edit]

Should it be noted here that the Xi-0 Baryon has the longest mean lifetime of all non-Nucleon Baryons? If not, am I wrong about this? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.1.50 (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Xi_b^*0[edit]

I added a Xi sub b 0* (usb) to the baryon list, as it was discovered by CMS collab at CERN, and published results on 2012-04-27 (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.5955.pdf). List_of_baryons#jp_.3D_3.E2.81.842.2B_baryons. Could some one also add it here? --91.213.255.7 (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Asterisks in JP[edit]

There are numerous asterisks in the JP column. What do they signify? Solo Owl 00:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

I had the same question about the asterisks on the isospin column. I don't see that the text explains this, but am guessing it has to do with varying isospin excitations. Wild guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.254.117 (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

underscores or subscripts?[edit]

Don't the underscores in Xi_b'- and Xi_b*- represent subscripts? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Merge Ξcc++[edit]

Generally on English Wikipedia, hadrons are grouped into articles about their main symbol. An exception being strange B meson, but that has been very well studied to the point where there's enough material for a separate article from B meson. The Ξcc++ baryon has only been observed in one decay mode in one paper (so far). I think it's far from being noteworthy enough for a separate article. — dukwon (talk) (contribs) 10:00, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Really, these articles should all be split. It's how I organized them way back when for convenience, but it was a mistake I made when I thought these were related particles. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I agree that organisation by main symbol is not ideal, but I don't think there should be separate articles for every individual state. It's getting a bit silly with the exotic mesons (X(3872), Zc(3900), Z(4430), Y(4140)). If they're going to be re-organised, I suggest mimicking the PDG: [1]. — dukwon (talk) (contribs) 12:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Mesons in general, are a fucking mess. Even non-exotic ones. I should know, I did a thesis on [originally] hadron nomenclatures, and mesons states were way too complicated to address. I managed to come up with a [IMO] much simpler naming scheme for baryons, but mesons were sadly too muddy to streamline. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Xi baryon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)