Talk:Yanacocha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Mining (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Peru (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Untitled[edit]

Some pictures of the mine itself would be much appreciated.-Jersey Devil 21:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

photos[edit]

I did send some pictures. Do you want more? I have "tons" of photos. ... .Euyasik (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Re the photo of the "renaturalised area, Aug 2005", is that really up at Yanacocha? The exposed rock certainly does not look like the top of an old open pit and I do not remember any trees like that up there. In fact, my lasting impression was of a treeless grassland. Mafestel (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Related article[edit]

For more information, see article “Mineral industry of Peru,” which discusses the role of the mineral industry in Peru’s national economic development. Furthermore, the article presents information about controversies generated by the mineral industry due to its adverse impacts on the environment and the livelihoods of rural communities.Sraman195 (talk) 03:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Neutral article??[edit]

Is this a neutral article? Or is it strong anti-mining? Nowhere we read that thousands of people found a job here, that the mine helps to develop the Cajamarcan area. ... . Euyasik (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

No, it is not a neutral article and the bias is quite strongly anti-mining. There is no information about the mine or its employees. I fear that mining is like a red rag to a bull as far as eco-activists are concerned so I'm not surprised. Mafestel (talk) 17:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean is it not a neutral article? All social protests have occured as you can find out by checking the sources. If you have any positive and reliable information on the mining activities in Cajamarca you should put it on the page. You can't blame eco-activists that they put their information here, you should blame others for not putting effort and sharing the information they have to get as more balanced view. And lastly on the content of you remark: yes mining generates work, but often not for the local people of the region itself. In mining cooperation Yanacocha for example, most people working in the mines and especially those managing the mines are high skilled workers from other provinces of Peru (often from Lima) and many are also from abroad. This is also why the mining company generates so much social tension in the region. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pachacutec (talkcontribs) 20:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yanacocha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Yanacocha/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Is this a neutral article? Or is it strong anti-mining? Nowhere we read that thousands of people found a job here, that the mine helps to develop the Cajamarcan area. ... . Euyasik (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 20:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 11:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yanacocha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yanacocha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 12 November 2016 (UTC)