Talk:Yellowhammer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleYellowhammer is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 5, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted

Link to Beethovens 5th[edit]

I've tagged the claim that Beethoven copied the Yellowhammers call for the 5th Symphony with a citation needed tag because I think the claim needs support. I'd also like to suggest that notation of both the call and 5th symphony opening motif be included in this article.Graham1973 (talk) 00:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Informal review[edit]

I've read through the article, as requested. A few minor quibbles, nothing much:

  • "formerly sometimes" is rather inelegant wording. I would simply say "at times"
Done Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "rufous": good word, but not that common (outside birdland, anyway). Perhaps amend to "reddish-brown"
kept "rufous", but linked now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Differences between the subspecies are small and clinal". Even with using the link, I couldn't work out what this means
added " geographically gradual" Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "...the full version can only be confused with..." – I don't see a need for "only" here
removed Jimfbleak - talk to me?
  • "Other vocalisations include a zit contact call, a see alarm, and a trilled tirrr given in flight". I assume that the terms "zit", "see" and "tirr" are onomatopaeic representations of bird sounds, but it might be wise to clarify this.
In practice, everyone makes the same deduction as you, and it has never been a sticking point in any of my FAs Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Invertebrates are added to the Yellowhammer's diet in the breeding season" – only a small point, but this wording carries a sense of third-party intervention, as if someone was organising the diet.
Good point, rephrased Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Predation accounted for more than 60% of nest failures in one survey". Perhaps addd brief details of the survey, e.g. is date and by whom?
Added year and country, by whom isn't really relevant unless it's someone notable in their own right Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is a "red-list" species?
Added gloss Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the cited texts, Lever 2005 lacks publisher location
Oops, I thought I'd checked these, done now. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

High class bird article, most instructive, worthy FAC candidate. Brianboulton (talk) 11:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

my changes. thanks very much Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yellowhammer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]