Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Power Station
|Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Power Station|
The rebuilt upper reservoir of the Taum Sauk plant, nearing completion in this photo, is the largest roller-compacted concrete dam in North America.
|Location||St. Francois Mountains, Missouri|
|Opening date||December 20, 1963, April 15, 2010|
|Owner(s)||Ameren Missouri (previously AmerenUE, formerly Union Electric)|
|Upper dam and spillways|
|Type of dam||Gravity dam|
|Height (foundation)||125 feet (38 m)|
|Length||6,800 feet (2,100 m)|
|Elevation at crest||1,601 feet (488 m)|
|Width (crest)||25 feet (7.6 m)|
|Width (base)||150 feet (46 m)|
|Dam volume||3,200,640 cubic yards (2,447,060 m3)|
|Spillway type||Broad crested weir|
|Spillway capacity||5,358 cubic feet per second (151.7 m3/s)|
|Total capacity||4,350 acre feet (5,370,000 m3)|
|Surface area||54.5 acres (22.1 ha)|
|Maximum water depth||120 feet (37 m)|
|Normal elevation||1,597 feet (487 m)|
|Lower dam and spillways|
|Type of dam||Gravity dam|
|Impounds||East Fork Black River|
|Height (foundation)||60 feet (18 m)|
|Height (thalweg)||55 feet (17 m)|
|Length||390 feet (120 m)|
|Elevation at crest||750 feet (230 m)|
|Width (base)||75 feet (23 m)|
|Spillway type||Ogee crest|
|Spillway capacity||70,000 cubic feet per second (2,000 m3/s)|
|Creates||Lower Taum Sauk Lake|
|Total capacity||6,350 acre feet (7,830,000 m3)|
|Catchment area||88 square miles (230 km2)|
|Surface area||395 acres (160 ha)|
|Normal elevation||749.5 feet (228.4 m)|
|Commission date||December 20, 1963, April 15, 2010|
|Hydraulic head||860 feet (260 m)|
|Pump-generators||2 × 225 MW reversible Francis type|
|Installed capacity||450 MW|
|Storage capacity||8 hours (3600 MW·h)|
|2017 generation||-148 GW·h|
The Taum Sauk pumped storage plant is a power station in the St. Francois mountain region of Missouri, United States about 90 miles (140 km) south of St. Louis near Lesterville, Missouri, in Reynolds County. It is operated by Ameren Missouri.
The pumped-storage hydroelectric plant was constructed from 1960–1962 and was designed to help meet daytime peak electric power demand. It began operation in 1963. Electrical generators are turned by water flowing from a reservoir on top of Proffit Mountain into a lower reservoir on the East Fork of the Black River. At night, excess electricity on the power grid is used to pump water back to the mountaintop.
The Taum Sauk plant is an open-loop pure pumped operation: unlike some other pumped storage sites, there is no natural primary flow into the upper reservoir available for generation. It is therefore a net consumer of electricity; the laws of thermodynamics dictate that more power is used to pump the water up the mountain than is generated when it comes down. However, the plant is still economical to operate because the upper reservoir is refilled at night, when the electrical generation system is running at low-cost baseline capacity. This ability to store huge amounts of energy led its operator to call Taum Sauk "the biggest battery that we have". An unusual feature is the upper reservoir which is constructed on a flat surface, requiring a dam around the entire perimeter.
On December 14, 2005, a catastrophic failure in the upper reservoir dam put the plant out of operation until it was rebuilt, recertified, and reopened on April 21, 2010. The new upper reservoir dam, rebuilt from the ground up, is the largest roller-compacted concrete dam in North America.
Size and location
The upper reservoir can hold about 1.5 billion U.S. gallons (4,600 acre feet; 5.7 million cubic meters) of water behind a wall nearly 100 feet (30 m) tall. It sits 760 feet (230 m) above the 450 MW hydroelectric plant, which gives it a greater head than that of Hoover Dam. The two are connected by a 7,000-foot (2,100 m) tunnel bored through the mountain.
The Taum Sauk upper reservoir sits atop Proffit Mountain, not Taum Sauk Mountain, which is about 5 miles (8.0 km) to the east. It is visible from Route 21 north of Centerville and from Route N approaching Johnson's Shut-ins State Park from the south.
Before the failure of the upper reservoir, visitors could drive to the top of Proffit Mountain and walk to an observation deck above the reservoir. Ameren operated a museum at the entrance gate highlighting the geologic and natural history of Missouri. The power plant was frequently visited by geology students because of a striking example of Precambrian/Cambrian unconformity in the rock layers exposed by the plant's construction.
In 1953, the Union Electric Company began to look for a site on which to build a new pumped storage plant. By 1958, company officials had decided to focus on sites with at least 300 feet (91 m) of vertical head, which would allow them to use a smaller storage reservoir. Union Electric hired Sverdrup-Parcel & Associates to evaluate potential sites in the St. Francois Mountains, which were chosen for their relative proximity to St. Louis (where Union Electric was based) and the favorably large elevation differentials (some approaching 1,000 feet (300 m)).
Sverdrup-Parcel & Associates intended to recommend Taum Sauk Mountain as the site, in part because it was the highest point in Missouri at 1,752 feet (534 m), but strong political opposition to development of the scenic mountain (which was later incorporated into a state park) ruled it out. The nearby Proffit Mountain ended up being an excellent alternative thanks to its comparable elevation (1,720 feet (520 m), the 6th-highest point in Missouri), its close proximity to the East Fork of the Black River, and the reasonably short distance (27 miles (43 km)) to the existing power transmission grid.
Construction on Taum Sauk began in 1960. The construction team consisted of Fruin-Colnon Construction and the Utah Construction and Mining Company. It went into operation in 1963 with two reversible pump-turbine units that could each generate 175 megawatts (235,000 hp) of power. It was not licensed by the US Federal Power Commission (the predecessor of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) because Union Electric contended that the FPC did not have jurisdiction over the non-navigable headwaters where the power station was constructed. In FPC v. Union Elec. Co., 381 U.S. 90 (1965), the United States Supreme Court held that the FPC did have jurisdiction and that Taum Sauk did require a FPC license. Although designed and built without federal supervision, a license was retroactively granted.
At its completion, the Taum Sauk plant was by far the largest pumped storage plant in North America in a number of measures, and was considered a major milestone in the development of pumped storage technology. Its pump-turbines were the largest ever produced at the time of construction, it had an unusually high head (the highest in the US at the time, far surpassing all previous US pumped storage projects), a large storage capacity (it has been described as "the first of the large capacity pumped-storage stations to begin operation in the United States"), black start capability, and had the unique ability to be operated either remotely by remote human operators in off-site facilities located 90–120 miles away (at St. Louis or Osage Power Plant/Bagnell Dam) or even fully automatically with zero human intervention. Taum Sauk was also the first pure pumped storage plant in the United States.
Minor leaks in the reservoir led to the construction of a collection pond and pumpback station to collect and return leaked water to the reservoir. Later, to reduce leakage, Geo-Synthetics installed lining material in the reservoir itself from September 13 to November 15, 2004.
The plant was named an IEEE Milestone in October 2005, just months before the upper reservoir failed. It was subsequently rededicated as an IEEE Milestone in 2010 after the new upper reservoir dam was completed.
2005 upper reservoir failure
At 5:12 a.m. on December 14, 2005, the northwest side of the upper reservoir was overtopped when water continued to be pumped from the lower reservoir after the upper was full. This led to the catastrophic failure of a triangular section of the reservoir wall and the release of 1 billion US gallons (3,800,000 m3) of water in 12 minutes. The sudden release sent a 20-foot (6.1 m) crest of water down the East Fork of the Black River.
A combination of design and construction flaws, continuing to operate the dam when the primary system for gauging the water level was known to be inaccurate (gauge pipes had become detached), moving the "failsafe" secondary gauging system above the actual height of the dam to avoid false positives, and operating the dam in an unsafe manner by routinely overfilling the reservoir caused the upper reservoir dam to overtop. There was no overflow spillway in the original reservoir.
A memo from Richard Cooper, superintendent of Ameren's Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Plant, indicated that the reservoir had a "Niagara Falls" style overflow on September 27 at the same spot that was breached (caused by wave action related to winds from Hurricane Rita). Another Cooper memo had also indicated that Cooper had warned that gauges used to monitor the water height in the reservoir were malfunctioning in October.
No one was killed by the failure. The superintendent of Johnson's Shut-Ins and Taum Sauk State Parks, Jerry Toops, his wife and three children were swept away when the wall of water obliterated their home. They survived, suffering from injuries and exposure. The children were transported to a hospital in St. Louis and later released. One child was treated for severe burns which resulted from heat packs applied by rescue workers as treatment for hypothermia.
The dam of the lower reservoir, which by design is able to hold much of the capacity of the upper reservoir, withstood the onslaught of the flood. By storing most of the deluge it spared towns downstream, including Lesterville and Centerville, from a damaging flood. A voluntary evacuation order was issued for those areas, but there was no damage. The high water was stopped at Clearwater Lake, the dam of which was not damaged by the rising waters.
Litigation and investigations
The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fined Ameren US$15 million pursuant to a settlement for the breach at Taum Sauk—a US$10 million civil penalty combined with the requirement to pay US$5 million into interest-bearing escrow in order to fund a variety of "project enhancements at or near the Taum Sauk project". The US$15 million fine was the largest fine in FERC's history, 30 times larger than the previous record fine of US$500,000.
The Missouri Highway Patrol delivered a report of its criminal investigation to the Missouri Attorney General in June 2007 which "did not name any suspect" and the attorney general made a statement that there would be no criminal charges. According to press reports, the report states that Ameren failed to provide the identity of the person who raised the gauges meant to prevent overtopping and also states that the gauges were moved before investigators were on the scene.
KMOX radio in St. Louis reported that the US Environmental Protection Agency assisted by the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Missouri had begun an investigation into violations of the Clean Water Act and has requested the Missouri Highway Patrol's report.
This article needs to be updated.February 2017)(
The Missouri Public Service Commission (PSC) reopened its investigation and subsequently found the accident to be a failure of Ameren management, stating:
...the Commission can only conclude that the loss of the Taum Sauk plant was due to imprudence on the part of UE (Ameren's AmerenUE Subsidiary). UE was well-aware of the catastrophic results likely to occur if the UR (Upper Reservoir) was overtopped by over-pumping. UE knew, or should have known, that storing water against the parapet wall of a rockfill dam was “unprecedented.” UE knew,or should have known, that operating with a freeboard of only one or two feet left no margin for error and required particularly accurate control of the UR water level. Given that circumstance, UE’s decision to continue operating Taum Sauk after the discovery of the failure of the gauge piping anchoring system and the consequent unreliability of the piezometers upon which the UR control system was based is frankly beyond imprudent – it is reckless. UE also knew or should have known that the upper Warrick probes had been reset above the lowest point at the top of the UR." (PSC Report page 71, definitions of Acronyms added)
Ameren had 90 days from the date of the report to tell the PSC how it will meet the recommendations of the report, which include a whistle blower rule, changes in safety management structure, financial accounting for the rebuild of the upper reservoir, and single point of management for the rebuild.
Federal regulators approved Ameren's plan to rebuild the reservoir, and construction began in late 2007. The rebuilt structure is made entirely of roller-compacted concrete, unlike the earth-fill original. In addition to better fill-detection instrumentation, it incorporates a spillway rated to handle overflow equal to the maximum capacity of both pumping units and a video system to monitor the water level. The US$490 million cost of rebuilding the reservoir was covered partially by insurance. The utility was prohibited from billing customers to recoup any of the cost.
Water was pumped into the rebuilt reservoir for the first time on February 27, 2010, and engineers monitored the response of the new structure as the water level was repeatedly raised and lowered. The final approval required from the FERC for “return to normal project operations” was received on April 1, 2010. The utility met the Missouri Public Service Commission’s in-service criteria for operations on April 15, and electricity was first generated from the new structure on April 21, 2010. The new dam was recognized by the United States Society on Dams with its "Award of Excellence in the Constructed Project". On September 27, 2010, IEEE rededicated the plant as an IEEE Milestone.
- Rogers, J. David; Watkins, Conor M. "Overview of the Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Power Plant Upper Reservoir Failure, Reynolds County, MO" (PDF). web.mst.edu. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
- "Taum Sauk Energy Center | Ameren Missouri". www.ameren.com. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
- "Report of Findings on the Overtopping and Embankment Breach of the Upper Dam - Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project, FERC No. 2277" (PDF). Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 28 April 2006. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- Rogers, J. David; Watkins, Conor; Hoffman, David J. "Overview and History of the Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project" (PDF). web.mst.edu. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
- Witt, Warren A. "Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Energy Center". Retrieved 29 December 2016.
- "FERC: Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project - Description". www.ferc.gov. Retrieved Mar 16, 2019.
- Danes and Moore (November 1981). "National Hydroelectric Power Resources Study: Volume X" (PDF). p. 75. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
The utilization factor for the plant ranges from five to eight percent. This is relatively low when compared to the 20 percent utilization factors of other plants such as Blenheim-Gilboa and is due to the different operating philosophies and generation mix of various utilities.
- ROGERS, J. D.; WATKINS, C. M.; CHUNG, J.-W. (2010-08-01). "The 2005 Upper Taum Sauk Dam Failure: A Case History". Environmental and Engineering Geoscience. 16 (3): 257–289. doi:10.2113/gseegeosci.16.3.257. ISSN 1078-7275.
- "Ameren UE unveils a revamped Taum Sauk reservoir". stltoday.com. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
- "AmerenUE's Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Plant Is Back Online". Ameren. 2010-04-21. Archived from the original on 2011-07-14. Retrieved 2010-04-22.
- "U. S. Society on Dams holds annual meeting and conference in California". HydroWorld.com. PennWell Corporation. 2010-04-16. Retrieved 2010-04-19.
- "Taum Sauk Facts & Figures". Ameren. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
- Rogers, J. David; Watkins, Conor M.; Chung, Jae-Won (1 August 2010). "The 2005 Upper Taum Sauk Dam Failure: A Case History" (PDF). Environmental and Engineering Geoscience. 16 (3): 257–289. doi:10.2113/gseegeosci.16.3.257. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/107050/fpc-v-union-elec-co/ FPC v. Union Elec. Co., 381 U.S. 90 (1965)
- https://www.mirrorpond.info/1997/09/ferc-abdication-of-jurisdiction/ FERC’s abdication of jurisdiction over hydroelectric dams on nonnavigable rivers, 27 Envtl. L. 741 (Fall 1997)
- "Rebuilding the Taum Sauk Pumped Storage Project's Upper Reservoir" (PDF). Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. June 2007. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- Hendron, Alfred J.; Ehasz, Joseph L.; Paul, Kermit (24 May 2006). "Taum Sauk Upper Dam Breach FERC No. P-2277 — Technical Reasons for the Breach of December 14, 2005 by FERC Independent Panel of Consultants (IPOC)" (PDF). Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- March, Patrick; Ratliff, Matthew; Kirchner, Phillip (16 July 2013). "Sticky Wickets: Correcting Trashrack Failure at a Pumped-Storage Plant". www.hydroworld.com. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- "AmerenUE Taum Sauk Reservoir Lining Project". Archived from the original on October 23, 2005. Retrieved 2005-12-14.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
- "Milestones:Taum Sauk Pumped-Storage Electric Power Plant, 1963". IEEE Global History Network. IEEE. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
- "Taum Sauk Rededication". Retrieved 8 January 2017.
- http://www.bpa.gov/power/PG/NW-HydroOperators-Forum/Materials/CaseStudyT-Sauk_Ehasz-Paul.pdf Missouri University of Science & Technology: The 2005 Upper Taum Sauk Dam Failure:A Case History
- http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/missouristatenews/story/0A4A827BA5C98DB2862570D7004F9A49?OpenDocument[permanent dead link]
- "AmerenUE agrees to pay $15 million - Settlement" (PDF). www.ferc.gov. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-06-26. Retrieved 2006-12-18.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Missouri Attorney General Press Release with link to Petition for lawsuit against Ameren for breach
- http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/06323A30D4407520862572F4000BDE98?OpenDocument[permanent dead link] St. Louis Post Dispatch article
- http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/06-08-2007/0004604925&EDATE= Ameren Press Release
- http://www.kmox.com/pages/603101.php?contentType=4&contentId=628667= Report on EPA Investigation
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-09-16. Retrieved 2007-10-28.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Water Power Magazine on PSC Report
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-17. Retrieved 2007-10-28.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Link to PSC Report Full Text
- "More trouble for Ameren Missouri's Taum Sauk hydroelectric plant". stltoday.com. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
- "Settlement reached in Taum Sauk reservoir collapse". semissourian.com. 28 November 2007. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
- Southeast Missourian (Cape Girardeau, Missouri): Taum Sauk Reservoir fails
- Ameren Press Releases: Media Release Detail, Media Release Detail
- Daily Journal (Park Hills, Missouri): Taum Sauk Dam Fails
- National Weather Service, St. Louis Office: Taum Sauk Dam Failure
- Photos from the USGS Mid-Continent Geographic Science Center
- Johnson's Shut-Ins State Park damage update page
- Ameren web pages on Taum Sauk and Johnson's Shut-ins restoration
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Taum Sauk Reservoir breach.|
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Power Station.|