Temnodontosaurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Temnodontosaurus
Temporal range: Early Jurassic, Hettangian–Toarcian
Temnodontosaurus trigonodon 5.JPG
T. trigonodon skeleton in metal frame, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Ichthyosauria
Family: Temnodontosauridae
Genus: Temnodontosaurus
Lydekker, 1889
Species[1][2]
  • T.? azerguensis Martin et al. 2012
  • T. crassimanus Blake 1876
  • T. eurycephalus McGowan 1974
  • T. nuertingensis von Huene 1931
  • T. platyodon Conybeare 1822
  • T. trigonodon Theodori 1843
  • T. zetlandicus Seeley 1880

Temnodontosaurus (Greek for "cutting-tooth lizard" – temno, meaning "to cut", odont meaning "tooth" and sauros meaning "lizard") is an extinct genus of ichthyosaur from the Early Jurassic period. They lived between 200 and 175 million years ago (Hettangian-Toarcian) in what is now Western Europe (England, France, Luxembourg, Germany and Belgium) and possibly Chile.[3] It lived in the deeper areas of the open ocean.[4] University of Bristol paleontologist Jeremy Martin described the genus Temnodontosaurus as "one of the most ecologically disparate genera of ichthyosaurs,"[5] although the number of valid Temnodontosaurus species has varied over the years.

Temnodontosaurus was one of the largest ichthyosaurs, with the type species (T. platyodon) reaching up to 8.5 metres (28 ft) in maximum body length.[6] It is known for its incredibly large eyes which, at approximately 20 cm (7.9 in) in diameter, are believed to be the largest of any known animal. It possessed a tail bend that was characteristic of Jurassic ichthyosaurs and had many conical teeth filling its jaw that were set in a continuous groove.[7][8]

History of discovery[edit]

Illustrations of the first skull and skeleton (NHMUK PV R1158) of T. platyodon found by Joseph and Mary Anning in 1811-12

The first ichthyosaur skull ever discovered was that of Temnodontosaurus platyodon. The specimen (BMNH 2149; now NHMUK PV R1158) was found in the Lias of Lyme Regis by Joseph Anning in 1811. The rest of the skeleton was recovered in 1812 by his sister, Mary Anning, but was later lost and never recovered. The ichthyosaur was subsequently described by the anatomist Sir Everard Home in what was the first scientific description of an ichthyosaur. T. platyodon is the most common species of Temnodontosaurus. The type of skull is currently located at the Natural History Museum in London. The specimen was originally named Ichthyosaurus platyodon but then renamed Temnodontosaurus. The genus Temnodontosaurus was named by Richard Lydekker in 1889.[9][8][10]

The species Temnodontosaurus platyodon was named by William Conybeare in 1822 from the specimen BMNH 2003 from the Lyme Regis. The specimen is located at the British Museum of Natural History. T. platyodon is from the Upper Hettangian-Lower Sinemurian. It is the type species for Temnodontosaurus. T. platyodon specimens have been found in England, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg. This includes the Lyme Regis in Dorset England, Herlikofen in Germany, Arlon in Belgium and Cloche d'or in Luxembourg. Only one known complete skeleton of T. platyodon exists (BMNH 2003), and there is also a well-preserved skull (BMNH R1158).[11][9][12]

Outdated model in Crystal Palace

In 1995, Christopher McGowan explained that the previously named T. risor species were really juvenile versions of T. platyodon. The specimen he used to back up his argument was one collected by David Sole in 1987 from Black Ven (East of Lyme Regis). The previously known T. risor specimens (three skulls) were seen as different from the T. platyodon species because they had larger orbits, smaller maxillae and curved snouts. However, McGowan described them as juveniles because of the small size of the forefin relative to the skull. The T. risor skulls are thought to be juveniles because the skull is relatively long compared to the postcranial skeleton.[11]

The species T. acutirostris was initially named by Richard Owen in 1840. This holotype (BMNH 14553) was from the Alum Shale Formation of Lower Toarcian in Whitby, Yorkshire, England. Michael Maisch, in 2000, described it as belonging in the genus Temnodontosaurus. However, in 2010, Maisch published a paper stating that the specimen didn't belong in Temnodontosaurus, as he had thought previously, and should probably be assigned to Ichthyosaurus instead.[13][12] As of 2022, this species has been placed as species inquirenda.[2]

T. trigonodon was named by von Theodori in 1843. The type specimen for T. trigonodon is an almost complete skeleton from the Upper Liassic of Banz, Germany of the Lower Toarcian. The specimen is roughly 9.8 m (32 ft) long with a 1.8 m (5.9 ft) long skull. Other specimens have been found in Germany, as well as in France from the Lower Toarcian of Saint Colombe in Yonne. A T. trigonodon specimen from the Upper Toarcian, Aalen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany is at the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart in Germany.[12][14][5]

The species T. eurycephalus has only one specimen: a holotype. The specimen (R 1157) is a skull and was named in 1974 by McGowan. It is from the Lower Sinemurian, Bucklandi Zone, and was found in Lyme Regis, Dorset, England, in a limestone bed called Broad Ledge. The T. eurycephalus specimen (R 1157) is currently located at the Natural History Museum in London.[12][15][5]

T. burgundiae skulls

The validity of the species T. burgundiae has been disputed. In 1995, McGowan proposed Leptopterygius burgundiae should be placed in Temnodontosaurus.[14] The paleontologist Michael Maisch does not see T. burgundiae as belonging to Temnodontosaurus. In 1998, Maisch identified this name as a junior synonym of T. trigonodon.[16] Martin Sander, in 2000, recognsizedT. burgundiae as a separate species, describing specimens from the Toarcian of the Holzmaden area of Germany and France as being Temnodontosaurus burgundiae.[7] However, this again has been met disagreement, for McGowan and Motani (2003) argued that all specimens of the Toarcian T. burgundiae belong to T. trigonodon and that although there are small osteological differences, they are not sufficent enough to keep this species valid.[17]

The species T. azerguensis was described in 2012 by Jeremy Martin of the University of Bristol, based on a holotype that is almost a complete skeleton from the Bifrons ammonite zone of the Middle Toarcian. It was found in 1984 by M. Dejob and Ms. Laurent from the Lafarge Quarry in Belmont d’Azergues, Rhone, France. The specific name derives from the name of the river and valley near the Belmont quarry where it was found: 'Azergues'. It is currently located at the Musee des Amis de la Mine in Saint-Pierre La Palud, Rhone department, France.[5] T. azerguensis is younger than other ichthyosaurs. It had a similar size and postcranial anatomy to other Temnodontosaurus species; however, its cranial morphology differed. The rostrum was more elongated and thin and had a reduced quadrate. Since T. azerguensis either had very small teeth or no teeth at all, it has been proposed that it was probably not effective at eating hard-shelled or bony prey and instead had a diet of smaller and softer prey compared to the other Temnodontosaurus species.

The holotype of T. crassimanus is on display at the Yorkshire Museum; however, it has remained understudied and the validity of the species has long been questioned. Swaby and Lomax (2020) highlighted several morphological features of the postcranial skeleton and determined that T. crassimanus is a valid species of the genus Temnodontosaurus and includes several distinct characters that can be used to distinguish it from T. trigonodon, to which it was once assigned.[18]

The largest temnodontosaurus known, the "Rutland Sea Dragon" about 10 metres long and 181 million years old, was discovered largely intact in 2021 in an English reservoir when water levels were lowered for winter maintenance.[19]

Description[edit]

Temnodontosaurus with a human for scale

Temnodontosaurus was a large ichthyosaur, with its tail as long as the body or longer. Initial length estimates for the specimen with a 1.5 m (4.9 ft) long skull (SMNS 50000) ranged between 9 and 12 m (30 and 39 ft) to even 15 m (49 ft).[11][12] However, the 2015 study argued that the previous studies have overestimated the size of this specimen. Martin and his colleagues measured the preflexural length of different ichthyosaur species (including Temnodontosaurus) which resulted in a preflexural length of 6.65 m (21.8 ft) for SMNS 50000 (assigned to T. trigonodon in the supplementary online material), indicating that the maximum body length of this specimen didn't exceed 6–7 m (20–23 ft); the other large European species, T. azerguensis, had a preflexural length of 8.4 m (28 ft), indicating that it would measure approximately 8–10 m (26–33 ft) in body length, and a T. platyodon with a 2 m (6.6 ft) long skull may have also reached 10 m (33 ft).[20] In 2022, Gregory S. Paul suggested new size estimates for T. platyodon at 8.5 metres (28 ft) in length and 2.6 metric tons (2.9 short tons) in body mass, while T. trigonodon at 11.2 metres (37 ft) and 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons); T. nuertingensis and T. crassimanus had the same body mass of up to 3 metric tons (3.3 short tons), while T. nuertingensis was estimated at 10 metres (33 ft) and T. crassimanus up to 9 metres (30 ft) in length.[6]

The forefins and hindfins of Temnodontosaurus were of roughly the same length and were rather narrow and elongated. This characteristic is unlike other post-Triassic ichthyosaurs such as the thunnosaurians, which had forefins at least twice the length of their hindfins. It was different from other post-Triassic ichthyosaurs like Ichthyosaurus, possessing an unreduced, tripartite pelvic girdle and having only 3 primary digits with one postaxial accessory digit. Like other ichthyosaurs, the fins exhibited strong hyperphalangy, but the fins were not involved in body propulsion; only the tail was used as the main propulsive force for movement, although it had a weak tail bend at an angle of less than 35°. Its caudal fin has variously been described as either lunate or semi-lunate; it was made of two lobes, in which the lower lobe was skeletally supported whereas the upper lobe was unsupported. The proximal elements of the fin formed a mosaic pattern, while the more distal elements were relatively round. It also had a triangular dorsal fin and had two notches on the fin's anterior margin; the paired fins were used to steer and stabilize the animal while swimming instead of paddling or propulsion devices.[8][12][7][5] It had roughly less than 90 vertebrae, and the axis and atlas of the vertebrae were fused together, serving as stabilization during swimming. T. trigonodon possessed unicipital ribs near the sacral region and the bicipital ribs more anteriorly, which helped to increase flexibility while swimming.[16]

Restoration of T. platyodon

Like other ichthyosaurs, Temnodontosaurus likely had high visual capacity and used vision as its primary sense while hunting. Temnodontosaurus had the largest eyes of any ichthyosaur and of any animal measured. The largest eyes measured belonged to the species T. platyodon. Despite the enormous size of its eyes, Temnodontosaurus had blind spots directly above its head due to the angle at which its eyes were pointed. The eyes of Temnodontosaurus had sclerotic rings, hypothesized to have provided the eyes with rigidity. The sclerotic rings of T. platyodon were at least 25 cm in diameter.[21][8]

The head of Temnodontosaurus had a long robust snout with an antorbital constriction. It also had an elongated maxilla, a long cheek region, and a long postorbital segment. The carotid foramen in the basisphenoid in the skull was paired and was separated by the parasphenoid. Also, the parasphenoid had a processus cultriformis. The skull of T. platyodon measured about 1.5 m (4.9 ft) long, while T. eurycephalus had a shorter rostrum and a deeper skull compared to other species, perhaps serving to help crush prey. T. platyodon and T. trigadon had a very long snout that was slightly curved on its dorsal side and ventrally curved, respectively. It also had many pointed conical teeth that were set in continuous grooves, rather than having individual sockets. This form of tooth implantation is known as aulacodonty. Its teeth typically had two or three carinae; notably, T. eurycephalus possessed bulbous roots, while T. nuertingensis had no canine or bulbous roots.[11][12][7][8]

Palaeobiology[edit]

Feeding mechanisms and diet[edit]

T. burgundiae attacks Stenopterygius hauffianus, Lias of Germany

Temnodontosaurus was an apex predator in the Early Jurassic seas. Its diet likely consisted mainly of vertebrates such as fish, plesiosaurs and other ichthyosaurs. It may have also preyed on cephalopods. It is the only Jurassic ichthyosaur genus for which a mainly-vertebrates diet has been proposed. One T. trigonodon specimen (located at the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart) shows remains of Stenopterygius, another ichthyosaur, in its abdominal cavity. Due to its more robust teeth and deeper jaw, T. eurycephalus probably ate large prey such as other ichthyosaurs, while species with pointed but more modest-sized teeth, such as T. platyodon, perhaps preferred soft-bodied prey and smaller vertebrates such as fish. Temnodontosaurus likely utilised ram feeding methods of predation. The movements of its jaw were likely rapid and so it probably used snapping rather than chewing mechanisms to eat its prey.[5][8][22][14][23]

Swimming and movement style[edit]

Like other ichthyosaurs, Temnodontosaurus was a fast cruiser or swimmer. Jurassic ichthyosaurs such as Temnodontosaurus swam via the lateral oscillation of their caudal fluke on a flexible tailstock. T. trigonodon had a highly flexible, long, thin body with a high vertebral count and modest regional differentiation. It used its large limbs as rudders. Its style of swimming was thunniform, unlike more basal ichthyosaurs whose swimming was anguilliform. This trait can be inferred in Temnodontosaurus and other Jurassic and post-Jurassic ichthyosaurs because of their semi-lunate tail fins and shortened bodies relative to the tail.[7][8][16]

Classification[edit]

Temnodontosaurus is the only genus in the family Temnodontosauridae.[24][15] The family Temnodontosauridae was described by C. McGowan and is from the Lower Liassic. Temnodontosauridae is part of the monophyletic group Neoichthyosauria, a clade named by Martin Sander in 2000 that includes the families Temnodontosauridae, Leptonectidae and Suevoleviathanidae.[12] Temnodontosaurus is one of the most basal post-Triassic ichthyosaurs.[13]

T. platyodon skeletons in London, including the holotype (bottom left)

The cladogram below is based on Maisch and Matzke (2000)[12] and Maisch and Matzke (2003)[25] with clade names following Maisch (2010):[13]

Merriamosauria 

Pessopteryx (=Merriamosaurus)

Besanosaurus

Shastasaurus

Shonisaurus

Mikadocephalus

Californosaurus

Callawayia

 Parvipelvia 

Macgowania

Hudsonelpidia

 Neoichthyosauria 

Temnodontosaurus

Eurhinosauria

Suevoleviathan

 Thunnosauria 

Ichthyosaurus

Stenopterygius

Ophthalmosauridae

The 2022 study which revived T. zetlandicus created a new majority rule consensus cladogram based on "non-clock Bayesian analysis," which found T. azerguensis to be too distant in relation compared to other species of Temnodontosaurus. The study also removed T. acutirostris from the genus, placing it as species inquirenda.[2]

Palaeoecology[edit]

The habitat of Temnodontosaurus was the open ocean, away from the shoreline.[4] It lived in the pelagic zone of the water column and didn't associate with the seafloor.[7]

Fossils of Temnodontosaurus have been found in England, Germany and France from rocks associated with marine environments. Specimens have been found especially in the Lias of the Lyme Regis in Dorset, England. The Lias is made up of alternating units of limestone and mudstone and contains many ammonites.[26] The newly described species T. azerguensis was found in a belemnite rich marlstone bed in the Bifrons ammonites zone, Middle Toarcian, in Belmont d’Azergues, Rhone, France.[5]

Temnodontosaurus fossils have been found in the Posidonia Shale near Holzmaden, Germany.[22] The Posidonia Shale is composed of black bituminous shales with intercalated bituminous limestone. The environment is known to have been marine because fossils of marine animals such as plesiosaurs, crocodylians and especially ammonites have been found there in abundance.[27]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Temnodontosaurus at fossilworks.org (retrieved 15 January 2022)
  2. ^ a b c Laboury, A.; Bennion, R.F.; Thuy, B.; Weis, R.; Fischer, V. (2022). "Anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Temnodontosaurus zetlandicus (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 195 (1): 172–194. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab118. Supporting Information
  3. ^ Otero, R.A.; Sepúlveda, P. (2020). "First Temnodontosaurid (Ichthyosauria, Parvipelvia) From the Lower Jurassic of the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile" (PDF). Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 98: 102459. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102459.
  4. ^ a b Motani R.(2000). “Rulers of the Jurassic seas”. Scientific American. 283 (6): 52-59
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Martin, J.E.; Fischer, V.; Vincent, P.; Suan, G. (2010). "A Longirostrine Temnodontosaurus (Ichthyosauria) with Comments on Early Jurassic Ichthyosaur Niche Partitioning and Disparity". Palaeontology. 55 (5): 995–1005. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01159.x.
  6. ^ a b Paul, Gregory S. (2022). The Princeton Field Guide to Mesozoic Sea Reptiles. Princeton University Press. pp. 141–145. ISBN 9780691193809.
  7. ^ a b c d e f Sander,P.M.(2000). "Ichthyosauria: their diversity, distribution, and phylogeny", Paläontologische Zeitschrift 74: 1–35
  8. ^ a b c d e f g McGowan, C. (1992). Dinosaurs, Spitfires, and Sea Dragons. Harvard University Press
  9. ^ a b Davis, Larry E. (2009). "Mary Anning of Lyme Regis: 19th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology". Headwaters: The Faculty Journal of the College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University 26: 96-126
  10. ^ Pierce, P. (2006). Jurassic Mary: Mary Anning and the Primeval Monsters. Sutton Publishing
  11. ^ a b c d McGowan, C. (1995). "Temnodontosaurus risor is a Juvenile of T. platyodon (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 14 (4): 472–479
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i Maisch MW, Matzke AT (2000). "The Ichthyosauria". Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde. Serie B. 298: 1–159.
  13. ^ a b c Maisch, Michael W. (2010). "Phylogeny, systematics, and origin of the Ichthyosauria – the state of the art" (PDF). Palaeodiversity. 3: 151–214.
  14. ^ a b c McGowan C. (1996). "Giant ichthyosaurs of the Early Jurassic". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 33(7): 1011-1021
  15. ^ a b McGowan, C. (1974). "A revision of the longipinnate ichthyosaurs of the Lower Jurassic of England, with descriptions of two new species (Reptilia, Ichthyosauria)". Life Sciences Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum 97: 1–37
  16. ^ a b c Emily A. Buchholtz (2000). Swimming styles in Jurassic Ichthyosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 21, 63-71
  17. ^ McGowan, C. and Motani, R. 2003. Handbook of Paleoherpetology, Part 8 Ichthyopterygia. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich. 175 pp.
  18. ^ Swaby. E.J and Lomax. D.R. (2020). A revision of Temnodontosaurus crassimanus (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria) from the Lower Jurassic (Toarcian) of Whitby, Yorkshire, UK. Historical Biology, https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2020.1826469.
  19. ^ Excavating the ‘Rutland Sea Dragon’, the largest ichthyosaur skeleton ever to be found in the UK! 10 Jan. 2022 in the Geological Curators' Group Blog [[1]]
  20. ^ Martin, J.E.; Vincent, P.; Suan, G.; Sharpe, T.; Hodges, P.; William, M.; Howells, C.; Fischer, V. (2015). "A Mysterious Giant Ichthyosaur from the Lowermost Jurassic of Wales". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences. 60 (4): 837–842. doi:10.4202/app.00062.2014. Supplementary Information
  21. ^ Motani R.(2005). Evolution of fish-shaped reptiles (Reptilia : Ichthyopterygia) in their physical environments and constraints. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 33: 395-420
  22. ^ a b Thies, D. & Hauff, R.B. (2013). A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Germany”. – N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 267: 117–124; Stuttgart
  23. ^ Scheyer, Torsten M. et al. (2014). Early Triassic Marine Biotic Recovery: The Predators’ Perspective. PLoS ONE 9.3 (2014): e88987
  24. ^ HIERARCHICAL TAXONOMY OF THE CLASS EODIAPSIDA. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
  25. ^ Maisch MW, Matzke AT (2003). "Observations on Triassic ichthyosaurs. Part XII. A new Lower Triassic ichthyosaur genus from Spitzbergen". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen. 229: 317–338. doi:10.1127/njgpa/229/2003/317.
  26. ^ “The lithostratigraphy of the Blue Lias Formation (Late Rhaetian–Early Sinemurian) in the southern part of the English Midlands”. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association. 112(2): 97-110
  27. ^ Bottjer, Etter, Hagadorn, Tang, editors (2001). “Exceptional Fossil Preservation”. Columbia University Press