Permanently protected template

Template:Admin dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 42
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 32
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 12
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 3
Wikipedia fully-protected edit requests 3
Wikipedia requested edits 176
Requested RD1 redactions 14
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 5
Candidates for speedy deletion 27
Open sockpuppet investigations 49
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page


Administrative backlog

WP:AIV


Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 3
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 8
Importance or significance not asserted 7
Possibly contested candidates 11
Other candidates 9
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Comment: I'm not sure what to make of this one. This does not match the name of the publisher or agent of the author they were writing about. I did find a publisher with a near-matching name but it publishes books for schoolchildren, not novels. I think the possible UPE is nore of a concern than the username Beeblebrox (talk) 18:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Talk:R179 (New York City Subway car)

Temporary Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry --- because of Rgalo10 [1] the Talk:R160 (New York City Subway car) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) talk page already protected by AmandaNP but the R179 talk page is missing please confirmed ECP immediately. 209.140.37.129 (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

(G)I-dle

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same issues started occuring again after the previous protection expired. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 04:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

World of Warcraft: Shadowlands

Indefinite semi-protection: many users (both registered and non-registered) who are apparently wow fans/players, insist on entering excessive plot information of the game and has been going on since this edit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_of_Warcraft%3A_Shadowlands&type=revision&diff=998663143&oldid=998632665

and another example of such vandalism to the plot section (along many others):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_of_Warcraft%3A_Shadowlands&type=revision&diff=1032806203&oldid=1030844876

most recently, user Br1lled (who has fewer than one page worth of edits) also insists on re-adding excessive plot details that we were challenged and deleted by more experienced editors, and resulting in an edit war. Grandia01 (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Claude Cahun

Temporary semi-protection: Edit war over Cahun's pronouns due to being featured in today's Google Doodle. AudiblySilenced✉️ 05:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Extinction Rebellion

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors & newly registered editors. Peaceray (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Gilgamesh

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This Good Article is seeing sporadic IP or new user vandalism. As an established page that will likely only be further improved through the work of experienced editors at this point, I believe applying semi-protection against non-auto-confirmed users would be productive. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Easy on Me

Reason: Repeated disruptive removals by a vandalistic registered editor who just returned from a 60-hour block. Ronherry (talk) 07:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Kobe Bryant

Unprotection: Bryant died in January 2020. ChilisMontrose (talk) 19:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Pinging the protecting administrator Zzuuzz. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
I only added move protection, which I think should probably remain. Semi-protection was applied back in 2007 by East718. I'm unconvinced of the wisdom of unprotecting it, but I've no objections. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ah, I didn’t spot that. East718 does not seem very active but let’s ping them for their input anyway. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Taking away semi-protection would be asking for trouble. Time of death is irrelevant as once a frequently disrupted page gets unprotected, that just opens up opportunities for that to resume. Not a risk worth taking. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Tom Brady

Reason: Change passing record Koolyoung (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Name of page you are requesting an edit to

I would like to edit the place of birth for Rumi from Afghanistan to Iran Aliroshansobh (talk) 03:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

3 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
User:Community Tech bot/Popular pages config.json (request) 2021-10-22 19:33 User JSON page (log)
Template:Main page image (request) 2021-10-23 10:59 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
London Buses route C10 (request) 2021-10-25 06:55 Fully protected (log) Protected by JBW on 2014-09-19: "Persistent sock puppetry"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
3 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2021-09-13 23:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Disambiguation (request) 2021-10-01 10:28 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2020-10-27: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Template:Fake heading (request) 2021-10-24 20:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-12-09: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 10:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

WP:PERM

Requests for accountcreator

Account creator

User:UserABCXYZ

I want to create account for users who want so Please Make me an account creator UserABCXYZ (talk) 10:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done You are not active in the ACC process, nor do you currently meet the requirements for becoming active in the ACC process. stwalkerster (talk) 11:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

User:Imcdc

I have created 57 articles so far. I would like to reduce the workload of NPP. I understand the higher risk given to articles involving live companies. Therefore I will take extra care as well the consultation of other more experiences editors when creating such articles. I withdrew last time to make sure the articles were cleaned up first. Imcdc (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 12:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done, sorry. There's nothing wrong with your creations per se, but as you say, articles on corporations are such a high risk topic that I would need to see a very compelling reason why they shouldn't be reviewed. – Joe (talk) 15:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
As an additional note, please take a little extra care with potential copyright violations: 1 2 3. Seddon talk 15:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Dora the Axe-plorer

I've been a seasoned contributor for over a year and have started 106 articles within that time span. There hasn't been any major issues related to my contributions (with the exception of one and I would never repeat that again, I haven't had any problems recently). CactusTaron (Nopen't) 12:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 Comment: So when looking to process this request I was initially confused by your signature in that in passing bares no relation to your actual username and it took a moment to clock they were the one and same user.
Currently the guidelines read A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username. Seddon talk 01:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
@Dora the Axe-plorer: Which article is the exception? – Joe (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
@Joe Roe: 1941 Jabal Razih earthquake & noted on that username thing as well. Dora the Axe-plorer (Nopen't) 23:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Ah, right. Sorry but copyright is something we have to be very careful about and, with that happening just a few months ago, I don't think I can grant you autopatrolled right now. Not done. – Joe (talk) 08:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Ralbegen

I've started more than sixty articles, including twenty-five this calendar year, and I've recently been starting several articles about elections coming up next year in the UK. I'm going to continue making these kinds of articles in the coming months, in particular. If I'm suitable for the autopatrolled right, that would resultingly reduce the workload of new page patrollers. Ralbegen (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Robertjamal12

I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and this right will aid me as I regularly create articles on Wikipedia. I humbly request this right to reduce the workload of NPP. Thank you Robertjamal12 (talk) 10:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
@Robertjamal12:. Thank you for putting yourself forward, but since two of your articles have been deleted this year, I think they would continue to benefit from review for the time being. Not done. – Joe (talk) 15:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

User:Royaljetgroup.digital

I would like to ask a request to edit this page as I am authorised to edit the page and work for the company of RoyalJet. Royaljetgroup.digital (talk) 17:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – User blocked for having a promotional username. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Hhappyduck

I have always liked Wikipedia ever since I was a kid. I am 24 years old now, and would like to contribute. Hhappyduck (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 05:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! — JJMC89(T·C) 06:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

User:Heartmusic678

Hi, I have been active in the mainspace, AfD discussions and the general backlog and would like to continue reducing the backlog with this additional permission. Thank you. Heartmusic678 (talk) 13:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
{{done}} for a two month period. At the conclusion of the period, if you wish to renew the tool, please add a request and ping me to it. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Actually, I'm going to reverse myself and leave this for someone else. I don't think I'm as familiar with the standards for granting in this space and this might be tricker than I thought. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 23:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for putting yourself forward, but Not done for the time being because I'm not seeing any experience with speedy deletion, which is an essential part of the job. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Styyx

I was granted NPR for a limited time, which expires soon. Haven't been the most active but I'd still want to continue. Thanks! ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 10:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 11:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Idoghor Melody

I've been working with AFC recently and I'd also like to help with page curation. Here is my AfC stats although my AfD stats might be poor because I tend to focus more on New pages feed. I'm familiar with content guidelines and policies and I believe I'll be able to perform well if given this permission. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Thisisnotcam

I'm looking to become more active in patrolling recent changes and new pages, and I feel like I'm less focused on deletionism than I was, say, five years ago (which my Talk Page reflects). I'm really interested in being able to more efficiently parse through new content on the wiki in addition to the tools I already use, like RTRC, Lupins, and Twinkle. ɯɐɔ 💬 04:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Advait.kansal

Hi, I wish to contribute in the new page reviews and contribute in reduction of queue backlog. Advait (talk) 10:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

User:Super Dromaeosaurus

Hello. I am an editor who frequently requests RMs and RMTs. I would like to have this permission simply for the sake of making my editing easier. I am not a person who usually check requests or very involved in the pages that make Wikipedia "work" (if I am explaining myself correctly), I usually focus on my interests and make move requests when I stumble upon a page that could have a better title in my opinion. I've had in the past a few controversial undiscussed moves in the past, such as Kishinev pogrom and Synod of Jassy (both from February of this year), but right now I almost never move by myself pages unless I am completely sure it will improve the article, and if I am not sure, I do a RM (sometimes they fail, but I'd say most are sucessful). The last example of a situation in which I could have benefited from having this permission was yesterday when I requested that Bird's wing be moved to Bird wing through a RMT which was successful. I've seen that some users have frequently been given this permission provisionally for 3 months, so I guess that could work for me for now. Super Ψ Dro 09:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Not seeing anything strongly against, not seeing anything strongly for. Main thing is a good agreement of RM and RM/TR requests with the end result. Leaning towards a temporary grant, will leave this open for further comment. Primefac (talk) 08:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

User:TrangaBellam

  • TrangaBellam (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma· non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)
  • Help manage the queue. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
    Administrator note @TrangaBellam: You seem to have a undeniable point of view about India-Pakistan and similar relations. I'm afraid this may affect your reviewing process, as you have used the undo button various times to re-add possibly biased or controversial text. @ToBeFree: I've pinged ping the admin that granted you rollback for another opinion in case I'm being overly cautious. Anarchyte (talk) 10:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    Pinging @RegentsPark:, as an admin patrolling ARBIPA. You seem to have a undeniable point of view about India-Pakistan and similar relations is an irrelevant observation - editors can have their POV as long their content is NPOV. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    TrangaBellam's editing is neutral as far as I can see so pending changes should not be a big deal. I did notice, however, this open SPI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Faizan involving them. I have no idea how valid the accusation is but perhaps it is better to wait till that is resolved. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    There should be no action until that SPI is resolved, yeah. I can also see Anarchyte's concern. Rollback is used for reverting pure vandalism only; pending changes reviews apply to good faith contributions as well. I have no opinion in this specific case, I'd just like to request that noone makes any decision based on my granting of rollback. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    Thanks to both of you. TrangaBellam (talk) 23:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    On some retrospection, the situation is surreal. Here Anarchyte is indirectly accusing me of an anti-Pak (or pro-India) POV while the SPI accuses me of the very contrary! TrangaBellam (talk) 23:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    Having a perceived POV is hardly an irrelevant observation when discussing content permissions. I didn't claim you had either a pro or anti-Pakistan bias, just that you had used the tools you already had to re-add possibly controversial text. Anarchyte (talk) 01:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
    I have only become familiar with TrangaBellam's edits today, but I am already extremely concerned by the examples I see of extreme and seemingly POV deletions of large bodies of content, see here and here, followed by bouts of edit warring to defend their highly contentious deletions with only the briefest of explanations in the edit comments and on the talk pages. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
    In your first example, I was cleaning a bunch of pages that were orbited by the same sock-farm. My edit was reverted very soon, and an admin reverted to my version. The page was eventually protected. Same for the second example - you can see my note at the talk-page, a lot of blocked socks, and an admin reverting to my version before protection.
    Nonetheless, you can dispute my edits but at the talk-page rather than here, having stalked me from the AfD. Thanks. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
    Yes, your vociferous and slightly combative tone in the AfD peaked my interest as to your editing trends. Just because a page has been sock-farmed does not automatically make that content incorrect or its removal correct. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
    Multiple other editors (incl. admins) have repeated my edits — please ping all of us, and start a discussion at the proper venue. Additionally, I had nowhere suggested that I was removing content because a page has been sock-farmed. I won't engage with your bad-faith arguments any further. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
@Anarchyte: The SPI has been closed by a CU as unsuccessful with not a single established editor being convinced of the claims. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
  • @TrangaBellam: As I have obviously formed an opinion, I'll let another uninvolved admin close this to give you every benefit of the doubt. Anarchyte (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  • @Anarchyte: I really don't see TrangaBellam misusing this tool so I'm going to grant them the permission. I don't see having or not having pending changes reviewer permissions a big deal so, since I've commented here, I'll wait a bit to see if you have any objections. --RegentsPark (comment) 14:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Lazy Maniik

  • Lazy Maniik (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma· non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · reviews · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)
  • I'm Currently extended confirmed , Rollbackers , IP Block Exemption Rights and have about 2,568+ edits, so that ought to qualify as a verifiable editing track record. I've been rather active since joining Wikipedia, and I spend a lot of time fighting vandalism, so I have experience to see what it looks like. I'm also familiar with AIV if it comes to that. Giving me this permission would help me fight vandalism, promote good editing, and save time for other editors.and I'm Currently Member of CUVA. Best Regards. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 13:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
    @Lazy Maniik: Hello, and thanks for stepping up to volunteer in this role. I immediately noticed that both in this request and in talk page messages (example) your talk page messages contain frequent typos and are sometimes difficult to comprehend, especially for newer users asking about your reverts. Are you able to commit to working on the clarity and grammar of those talk page messages?
    Additionally, could you explain the following reverts: Special:Diff/1050993049, Special:Diff/1050708485? Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 23:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

@L235: Yes, you are right, there are many mistakes, but I did not say bad to that User, I only told him that the parameter was marked for removal, I am trying to improve myself I am trying, yes or no because I don't understand British English much, but I have answered them in my own language, sometimes I have to resort to google translation too, but I will try to answer as soon as possible. I am unable to explain, and 1-the reason for deleting the revert was removed from my mistakes but when I wanted to revert the edit, then someone anonymous made the edit, so I could not remove your edit 2-second The reason for the revert is that when one file already exists there was no need to add another, so removed that too with the name of that actress, I've come to wikipedia to make good edits. Best Regards. ---✨LazyManiik✨ 04:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Liberty1892

Not done Too new. Anarchyte (talk) 06:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

User:SeanJ 2007

User:SarahJH07

I want to be a PCR to reviewing some of these obsolete review pages. sjh (talk) 05:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

User:DigitalChutney

I am a Rollbacker and have a good experience with counter vandalism and Wikipedia policy. I have read the guidance on reviewing pending changes and feel that I meet the criteria. Thanks, DigitalChutney (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Advait.kansal

I wish to have PCR access and contribute to the review process. Thanks. Advait (talk) 09:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Hardyplants

Requests for rollback

Rollback

User:Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!

I have been an editor for several years and have noticed on several recent occasions that when I need to revert uncited additions or promotional additions, that I need to revert each change separately. The same is true with confronting vandalism. I think with the article reversions I did today, that I would benefit from having the Rollback tool as it will make my reversions less time consuming. Thank you for your time. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 04:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
@Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl!: How would you respond to the following edits?
  1. Helianthus petiolaris
  2. Richard Frank (actor)
  3. Illuminati Hotties
  4. Josh Lambo
  5. Mauricio Balter
(@Enterprisey: side ping) Anarchyte (talk) 14:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the question User:Anarchyte. The first edit is vandalism, so I would remove it. As it is an IP address with no further edits, and there is no similar history of vandalism on the page, that would be my final step. As for the second edit, as the page is entirely unsourced, this edit would catch my eye if I were watching the page. Then again, if I were watching the page, I would have tried to add sources to the pre-existing content, but in this case the edit can be adjusted for promotional language and I could add a source like this one [5] to it. I'd likely check the IP address for past edits, and see they made previous edits promoting conspiracy theories, and address those by reverting them if the content is still there. This page is under restriction though, so today such an edit wouldn't be possible. For the third edit, it looks like there is an argument it is supported by the existing source at the end of the sentence, so there is nothing to do here in my mind, but if someone else reverted it I wouldn't protest if they felt there was some issue with it. The fourth edit represents an IP address that has vandalized the page three times, so I'd revert and give a level one warning to the IP on their page - but it got reverted within one second by another editor, so at my editing pace, they'd have gotten to it before me. In terms of the final edit, I do not read Hebrew, so would not be able to comment on whether the source supports the first part of the edit. As the page is related to religion, it is also very unlikely that I would choose to get involved, but if I somehow came upon it - the IP was blocked due to some internal mechanism leading to a block, so would assume that whoever blocked it, was watching the page and I wouldn't step on their toes. That said, this is clearly a second batch of edits from the sock IP that has yet to be reverted, so I would not have an issue with someone else reverting it. Of course if it was somehow my responsibility - I'd revert the batch of edits. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

User:LightPirate

I want to help Wikipedia more with reverting vandalism and disruptive edits. I think using Rollback and Huggle will help me do so more efficiently. LightPirate (talk) 10:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

User:ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ

Hello, I've decided to get rollback rights about this title. Thank you! ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 07:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 07:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Advait.kansal

I have been fighting vandalism at Wikipedia, I was able to find few sockpuppet accounts who were continuosly indulging in vandalism and they were blocked on my submission. I wish to have this right to use Huggle for making better contribution. Advait (talk) 19:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

User:444metaphor

To able to rollback unnecessary edits and help fighting vandalism like other users vandalising created articles 444metaphor (talk) 02:16, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 03:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 18 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 03:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 18 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Ekdalian

I have been fighting against vandalism especially in Indian caste & related articles for years. I am now using Twinkle in order perform reverts more effectively, but Twinkle is a bit slow. Pinging senior admins Bishonen & RegentsPark, who are aware of my work here for their comments, if any. I am ready to withdraw this request, if advised. Thanks & Regards. Ekdalian (talk) 13:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 13:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 13:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

User:N1234567

I want to improve Wikipedia articles by rolling back vandalism and disruptive edits. I want to improve Wikipedia articles by rolling back vandalism and disruptive edits. This will also save time. Regards N1234567 (talk) 19:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

Parameters

This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor and other tools. Click here to see a monthly parameter usage report for this template based on this TemplateData.

TemplateData for Admin dashboard

Administrators Dashboard

Template parameters

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
style1

Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.

Default
Stringoptional
New administratornewadmin

Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.

Default
no
Stringoptional
Show AIVshowaiv

Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.

Default
yes
Stringoptional
Show PERMshowperm

Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show RfA/RfBshowrfab

Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show account creatorshowacc

Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show autopatrolledshowaptl

Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show confirmedshowconf

Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show extended confirmedshowext

Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show file movershowfmvr

Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show new page reviewershownpr

Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show page movershowpmvr

Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show reviewershowrevr

Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show rollbackshowrlbk

Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional
Show template editorshowte

Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.

Default
7 days
Stringoptional

See also