Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2025-39343-65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Pepetheforg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Md Qammar Khan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:50, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-39335-30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Antellison23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-36993-37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Arya Train (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1067 (LTA 1067, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- MacjunStefanNoHateFan1388 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Crustav00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 67.222.238.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Persistent page-blanking vandalism, from multiple temp accounts. Also vandalizing across multiple wikis. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- 2806:2F0:1060:0:0:0:0:0/48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) - Persistent page-blanking vandalism and other patent nonsense for the last 2 years straight. See both the Legacy IP edits and the temp account logs. This appears to be some kind of LTA. And there have been no good edits coming out of this range in that time. Requesting a block for at least 6-12 months. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-39574-48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On :DJ Akademiks (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Egregious BLP violation. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 06:40, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Takeru0811 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On :Zeiram: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- MacjunStefanNoHateFan1388 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. See also filter log. Annh07 (talk) 08:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Anu22nursing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Used 2 instead of s attempting to skip filter: anus. Violating string: anussnursing" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Keralafamilyhistories (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Actual Idiot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Churchill official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Bardushmanemurtazaalilanat (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mfsaregay (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Orange.fl.us (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Breadpachinko (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Amarastudios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Professionalbasketballplayershahab (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- CanterburyCathedralOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Officialdjmaxis (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ringfamily1650 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- EYTP IS BACK (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- NeuroLanguageBot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Артем1291 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sigmaboyrizz67 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "rizz" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- GlobalComplianceAgency (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Asnccdjsiancjdisancjicdsacnjdsaiasdc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MacjunStefanNoHateFan1388 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Fagot1986 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Offensive username – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 17:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Keep monitoring the user, until their username is more clear.. Fagot is a musical instrument in Dutch and a surname in French, so there is a chance this is good-faith and requires a discussion rather than an immediately block. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- They've no edits on en at all, so nothing to monitor really. All edits are on Ukrainian wiki. Secretlondon (talk) 08:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Coffee.table955.com443 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username: URL – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 21:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @LuniZunie: What domain or URL is this advertising? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:35, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan I apologise, I had assumed they were covering up a URL with numbers. I should have checked if the underlying URL was a real website; it did not cross my mind that an account would be named like this and not be connected to a website. Will keep in mind in the future. – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 22:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @LuniZunie: I mostly wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. It's possible that a spam domain is about to be registered, but we can probably wait to see what the account does. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- They struck me as swcure port numbers though while 443 fits, that would be 995 rather than 955. Cabayi (talk) 17:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @LuniZunie: I mostly wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. It's possible that a spam domain is about to be registered, but we can probably wait to see what the account does. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan I apologise, I had assumed they were covering up a URL with numbers. I should have checked if the underlying URL was a real website; it did not cross my mind that an account would be named like this and not be connected to a website. Will keep in mind in the future. – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 22:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @LuniZunie: What domain or URL is this advertising? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:35, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- PROMOTER SUPER ALHAJI (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. mwwv converse∫edits 00:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Kairos Panho Kim (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Created promotional user page. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- real name. Secretlondon (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Editor is obv block evasion of SPecial:Contributions/Youngsan Theological Seminary, reported as SPI. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Dogwater123 in my dih (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. Sugar Tax (talk) 09:13, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- CartierRecordsENT (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Tankishguy 15:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Testuseraccountforapi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Implies bot account, see contribs. tony 18:10, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Planet Tooting (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Mainly edits Draft:Tooting Market. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 20:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Tomato.hk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username: URL – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 23:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Up Education AU (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. HurricaneZetaC 00:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Uuuhhhhhskibiditoiletismassiverightuhhhhh (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 01:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Max Alex Sam Buster (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Username implies shared use by four people. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:28, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- MK Roofing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- GaryAlvin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Account seems to be engaged in promotional editing for Gary Franks (see Talk Page) and continues to edit despite warnings. aggarwala2727 (talk) 02:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Curejm (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Cure JM Foundation. Nil🥝 03:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- NCFO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:NCFO/sandbox. Annh07 (talk) 08:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Reason: Pattern of vandalism and addition of uncited information by temporary and new accounts. Activity seems to be driven by the article being currently linked on the front page of the site it describes. This is confirmed by the presence of soyjack-adjacent slang in the edit summaries. Users of the site have a history of raiding Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, so this behavior can be expected to continue for at least a week. ~2025-37440-32 (talk) 11:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Not done The article is busy, but it isn't to a point that protection would help. Not every person reverting and such is new. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 06:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/DTHD, again. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Account gets created after reverting incorrect information. 1 2 3 –LDM2003 talk to me! 14:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruption by WP:LTA/DTHD. Account gets created after reverting it. 1 2 3 4. –LDM2003 talk to me! 14:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's a tendency for certain IPs to remove a case detail. More such edits are highly likely since the verdict just came today. See history. Teegarden's Star b (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeatedly targeted by IP hopping sock Number 57 15:57, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistant disruptive editing by same ip-hopping user also active on recently protected articles Handan Sultan and Halime Sultan Phso2 (talk) 16:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Content is sourced if you have a problem open a talk page ~2025-39355-90 (talk) 17:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant rotating IP vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Incessant rotating IP vandalism. Anwegmann (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Wikishovel (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Controversial, widely-reported topic; ongoing dispute regarding mergers between 2 other similar articles; some edit warring ~2025-33890-41 (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/3 Löwi. This has been going on since at least July and the latest temporary account has already indicated that this is clearly the same person. Mellk (talk) 23:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Mellk There's not much we can do here if the accounts are autoconfirmed, as the last (non-TA) one was. ECP for a month or more seems overkill. Thoughts? I can do a few days of semi. Toadspike [Talk] 02:36, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Gd123lbp (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Not done The disputed content should be discussed at WP:BLPN. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: See Talk:Kobi Kambon#exterminate White people off the face of the planet. New users confuse Kobi Kambon with Kamau Kambon and add massive violations of WP:BLP (Kobi Kambon died in 2018, so I guess BLP still applies). Also see previous page protection, requested at Special:Permalink/1310959867#Kobi_Kambon. — Chrisahn (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Note: BLP applies to living and recently deceased individuals only. "Recent is usually a few months but can be as much as two years. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple WP:OWN related cases of undoing edits. The company is long-since dead, the company have sold their ring, the wrestlers formed two separate new promotions and the belts are being used elsewhere, but Addicted4517 and HHHPedrigree refuse to let others change the edits because they feel it's their right to ignore racist sources when the company is too small to have explicit sources to indicate a closure. It was closed on the down-low, but nobody can edit without Addicted in particular undoing their edits. ~2025-36524-62 (talk) 02:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You do realise the only effect of protection would be to stop you from editing the article? The Bushranger One ping only 05:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Was just unprotected and is again being inundated with promotional garbage aesurias (talk) 03:44, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Indianmusicloveriml (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. The Bushranger One ping only 05:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism/misinformation from IP and newly created Accounts GeminiHeron (talk) 04:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The Bushranger One ping only 05:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article has recently been targeted/disrupted by a various IPs (now temp accounts) with serious BLP vios, really vandalism of content. Covered by WP:CT/SA. Gotitbro (talk) 04:50, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – The article is about a book which is about the Arab-Israeli conflict. TarnishedPathtalk 05:44, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 06:30, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Subject's spouse and ex-spouse are edit warring on his article again. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 06:49, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC) |
| 9 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Longtime editor dating back to 2006 who hopes to reduce the backlog at New Pages Patrol, of which I am a former member. Not a prolific article creator but I have started many on music albums, hiking/outdoors, and court cases. I plan to utilize my personal expertise to fill in all the red links in this list and this list. I also have professional knowledge of legal matters and hope to create many articles on Supreme Court and Appeals Court cases that are currently absent from Wikipedia. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:27, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
I am applying for autopatrolled. I am also NPP and AfC reviewer and participate in AfC backlog and NPP backlog. My focus topic is for music and following the WP:NSONG, WP:NALBUM, and WP:GNG but somehow I do create some articles rarely off-topic for music. But, my primary goal is Music-related articles only and create notable Filipino music. You can check my contributions here. ROY is WAR Talk! 08:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to request autopatrolled rights, seeing as I've made 32 mainspace articles, none of which are stubs (I do not rate my own created pages). Thus far, I've focused on creating pages related to music, most of which pertain to WP:Albums. Thanks, Fundgy (talk) 06:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I would like to request for AWB rights. I have begun to do more and more grammar and MoS fixes. It would be nice to be able to use AWB to help with such tedious tasks. – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 23:52, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have used AWB to good effect in the past, and I think it would be a considerable help to me now. Since I restarted last month, I've done over 1,500 edits, and a high percentage of them have been iterative amendments/corrections/enhancements across ranges of articles. I know I qualify for the software in terms of edit count, but I've only been back here for a couple of weeks, so I'll understand if you want me to apply again at a later date. Thanks very much, Jack (talk) 11:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
I request the AWB right so that I can quickly render articles compliant with the manual of style, fix typos and formatting errors and (re)categorise pages with missing or erroneous categories. randFreeman 05:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I would like to update my father's Wikipedia page to contain more information about his life. Tlfarah (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Becoming a manually "confirmed" user on Wikipedia earlier than the standard, automated route offers immediate access to critical editing tools, providing a substantial advantage for dedicated contributors and those involved in structured editing projects. The standard autoconfirmed status requires an editor to wait four days and make ten edits naturally over time. Requesting manual confirmation bypasses this waiting period entirely, accelerating an editor's ability to fully participate in the encyclopedia's collaborative environment. The primary motivation for seeking this status earlier is to immediately gain the trust and functionality necessary to circumvent anti-vandalism measures designed for brand-new accounts. Confirmed editors can instantly begin editing semi-protected pages, which are often high-traffic or controversial articles that administrators lock down to prevent disruption. Furthermore, they are immediately empowered to create new articles directly in the main encyclopedia space without the bottleneck of submitting drafts through the Articles for Creation process. Early confirmation also unlocks essential account maintenance tasks, such as moving or renaming pages to correct titles and uploading files (images, multimedia) to support articles. For those participating in group editing events like edit-a-thons, obtaining this status immediately is crucial, as it allows participants to focus purely on content creation rather than administrative hurdles. In essence, seeking early confirmation is a practical step for serious editors to immediately remove the software limitations imposed on new users, allowing them to contribute efficiently and without artificial delay. The Force Awakens The Last Jedi Who Became A Rouge One (talk) 06:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I’ve already created a few articles and I often check new pages for sourcing, notability, and overall quality. I also help out in AfD discussions when I can, mostly to look at whether topics meet notability and if the sources are solid. I enjoy helping new editors fix their pages and guiding them on what needs improvement. Since I’m already active in this area, I’d like to take a more direct role in keeping the new pages feed clean and helping page creators understand the basics. Becoming a reviewer would let me contribute more effectively. Thanks for considering my request! Acrom12 (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello to the reviewer! I've noticed the large backlog and would like to help make some progress with patrolling pages, mainly redirects. I have some previous experience in the article for creation space, creating my own articles, and creating my own redirects. I try to help new incoming editors, including mentoring my current partner and teaching them how to use the features of Wikipedia. I'm capable of catching content that probably shouldn't belong on Wikipedia, but also helping new users expand draft articles. I participate in AfD, though my suggestions are often rejected; I consider this a skill that I am still learning. It's worth noting that I have never misused speedy deletion or other non-discussion deletion methods; my usage of these has been successful when I have applied them. Even still, my knowledge of AfC and redirects provides me with a good basis to use this right. Thank you, and please ask any questions you may have. aaronneallucas (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
I've been editing a while and over recent years have been helping mostly with WP:Ukraine-related topics and pages. Having done research on Ukraine on and off-wiki, I would like to extend the help to review new Ukraine and related page creations. I have 7 successful FL nominations (one was a joint-nomination), 1 successful GA (Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine) and 1 unsuccessful (NAFO). Thanks in advance and feel free to ping me with questions/comments. Dan the Animator 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the New Pages Patrol right. I have 4,000+ edits, including over 2,500 in mainspace and 500+ article creations. My work has given me solid experience with core content policies, particularly notability GNG, reliable sourcing, verifiability, and BLP compliance. I also participate in AfD discussions and review drafts, which has strengthened my understanding of how these policies apply to new pages. I would like to support the community by helping maintain the quality of new articles, identifying issues early, and guiding new editors toward constructive contributions. I have no blocks or sanctions. Thank you for considering my request. Sweetabena (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
My one month trial of the New Page Reviewer right will expire in 8 days I have really enjoyed working as part of NPP and am grateful to Rosguill for granting me the trial. I would like to request a renewals of the right I know it is slightly early but I would appreciate being considered especially with the December 2025 Backlog Drive approaching. I would LOVE to continue contributing during the drive and beyond. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 21:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I was a New page reviewer in 2023, and lost the rights due to a block on my account in early 2024. I appealed in September 2024 and returned to Wikipedia, and shortly thereafter requested my previous permissions be restored. I was told it was too early after coming back to regain such rights and that I should work on regaining trust first before applying again. It's been 15 months and around 2,000 more edits since I have returned and I was hoping that I could be considered for this role again. Thanks EytanMelech (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
I'm looking to work on the extensive backlog and be able to contribute more effectively, and efficiently to an area of the encyclopedia I am passionate about. I have been fairly active in the AfC process, have created multiple articles, and promoted two existing ones to good article status myself. In addition, I am a fairly active participant at XfD and monitor the New Pages Feed regularly, so I know what to expect as a New Page Patroller. TheInevitables (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Re-applying after a one-month NPP trial. I have been very careful and judicious in using my NPP rights and will be happy to continue helping reduce the backlog. Thank you! Yenistardom (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
I have noticed that there is a massive backlog, and I assume you could use some help. I’d love to provide that help. Cooldood5555 (let's talk) 22:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Hi! I've noticed that WP:RM/T is often backlogged whenever I visit or place a new request and have to wait for hours for a response. It happens usually when its nighttime in the western hemisphere. So, I've decided to help reduce the backlog as I could. I can help with both RMT and closing RMs. Thanks for considering! Vestrian24Bio 10:32, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
I am an active NPP using the Page Curation tool to review recent submissions. I frequently encounter new, unsourced, or problematic articles that require draftification (as shown in my recent move history) ACROM12 [TALK] 11:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I would like to request Pending changes reviewer so we can review pending changes. I have made over 250 mainspace edits and have 500 total edits. Aikee Moral (talk) 13:39, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request the rights to help review Pending Changes edits efficiently and speed up the review process. Bagwe Neza (talk) 14:49, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting to be a requested changes reviewer as I got understanding of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Vandalism, Wikipedia:Verifiability. While I may of had multiple articles made by me rejected, this was from a while ago that I don't bother working on when I was absolutely terrible of editing around like 3 months ago. Additionally, I would be happy to work doing reviewing changes and checking it at least every day. Additionally, I got 900+ edits, and joined around 6 months ago with loads of huge editing, notably my 61016 article I have made.
I have a strong track record of removing vandalism, although there were several mistakes reported on my talk page while I was still a new user. I am also an active participant in speedy deletion, and have rollbacker and AfC permissions. I agree to use this right only to approve helpful edits and not to reinstate vandalism or discourage new uses by rejecting their changes. Somepinkdude (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
My request was declined, so I am requesting Pending changes reviewer again, with 600 total edits. Aikee Moral (talk) 05:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I am requesting rollback after willingly giving up Twinkle, and more recently being suggested I request rollback. I believe Rollback would be beneficial to my patrolling of recent edits. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 14:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been RC patrolling for over two months now. Clicking individual diff links to revert edits is very inefficient and unnecessary, and I believe having rollback could fix this. I've made over 200 edits to mainspace and have no history of edit warring. Seanwk :) (Talk | Contribs) 02:42, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights. I regularly revert vandalism and want to do it more efficiently. I understand how rollback works and will use it carefully. ACROM12 [TALK] 11:52, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been RC patrolling using Twinkle, Ultraviolet and VandalHandle. I've made over 200 edits to mainspace and have no history of edit warring. ~~~~ VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 21:37, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
I have over 4,500 edits and I've actually been on for just a little less than a year now and have some good experience of reverting vandalism. I have patrolled the recent changes and have reverted some bad faith edits. I have run into a few times where I would have liked to be able to revert the full vandalism someone made so I would like to have rollback rights to do so. Thank you, Floating Orb Talk! my edits 22:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback to remove vandalism more efficiently. I have over 900 edits most of which are from RC patrol. I have no history of edit warring, and always warn users if they vandalise pages. I would like rollback rights to use AntiVandal. Thanks. SuperCode111 (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
I am sure some people know how long I've been around on Wikipedia and do try my best to help out the project. I've only realised the change in system just now and thought I saw IP connection, however I seem to have been wrong at one AfD. I feel it would be helpful if I could see IPs again, in order to help do my part to help the admins and oversight community to deal with threats. I've helped with SPIs on some occasions, and feel it would be helpful to have this in my arsenal, so to speak. Regards Govvy (talk) 19:34, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
I have been dealing with a long term IP vandal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/220.255.60.227/Archive) across several articles and this permission would be of great help. Thank you. Aleain (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
I have dealt with vandalism since I first made this account. I need this permission so I can easily identify suspicious editors. Scoophole2021 (talk). 15:55, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
I work on NPP and AFC and this would assist in my work there, as identifying any issues with the past behavior of a TA can be a bit of a black box. More importantly, several articles and topic areas I work on and have watchlisted receive specific patterns of vandalism and problematic BLP editing on pages of contentious fringe political BLPs that are difficult to detect and report without IP access. Having TAIV access would help me identify these issues and report these issues to the proper channels. I agree to abide by the policy set for usage of the right. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
going through page histories, i often have to revert all the edits of a user. taiv would help to find the problematic edits of temporary accounts. ltbdl (activate) 05:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |