- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 17:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by Prioryman (talk), Sladen (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 23:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting article. QPQ done. Hook correctly formatted (minor tweaks), length and date fine, sources reliable, photo licensed. One small issue: the lead (or lede) is usually either (1) without inline citations, summarizing info from the body of the article that does have inline citations, or (2) with complete inline citations, at least some of the material not in the body of the article. Pick (1) or (2) and go for it! Otherwise, well-written article. Shame about the couple. Anne (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I've rejigged it a bit to resolve this issue. Please take a look and see if it satisfies your concerns. Prioryman (talk) 00:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
- Great! You're good to go. Anne (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)