Created by Hayden120 (talk). Self nominated at 09:19, 22 February 2013 (UTC).
It is truly an honour to review this nomination, article length is definitely fine, hook is interesting, article is within policy, and new enough; my only concern was that this article was created at February 17th, 2013 10:29pm UTC, not February 18 as stated in the DYK nominations; however, this should not be a major concern as your article could have been created in February 18th within an UTC 2+ or more hour time zone. Good to go!Link from the Void (talk) 22:34, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you're looking at, but the article history says this was created on February 18, as does the DYK Check tool. But as you say, it really doesn't even make a difference since it was nominated within the time frame for either date. — Maile (talk) 23:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)