- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 00:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Chinchillidae, Southern viscacha, Northern viscacha
- Reviewed: Lectionary 313, Lectionary 315
- Comment: Also reviewed Black Hole Creek
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 09:31, 5 October 2013 (UTC).
- Length/5x expansion, dates, NPOV are ok. Image is good (and a featured picture on Commons!). The hook is good too, although I would like to propose the following alt:
- ALT1: ... that the northern viscacha and the southern viscacha (pictured), members of the Chinchillidae family, can be found at altitudes as high as 5,000 metres (16,000 ft) above sea level?
- Either way, nice articles. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 is good and better than the original hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 is interesting, within length, format ok, 5000m asl fact is in both species articles and referenced to online source, would not expect to see it in the Chinchillidae article as well as that covers species not found at those levels, that article contains a cited reference that the two species are part of that family. Remainder of approval per review by Thingg. Good to go. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 22:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)